Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Superbug research to influence medicine across the world

Post Thumbnail

New research has, for the first time, provided guidance on the amount of antibiotics that can safely be prescribed without generating resistant superbugs.

Antibiotics play a crucial role in healthcare but overuse can cause bacteria to become resistant to them, which can lead to the rise of deadly superbugs such as MRSA.

It’s estimated that drug-resistant strains of bacteria are responsible for 5,000 deaths a year in the UK and 25,000 in Europe.

Until now there has been no clear guidance as to the maximum level of antibiotics that individuals can tolerate without bugs developing this resistance.

But a study, led by NHS Grampian in collaboration with Aberdeen University’s Professor Ian Gould, could help determine this threshold for several different types of antibiotic.

Controlling prescribing can ensure antibiotics remain effective for those who need them most but until now, there have been no clear guidelines on the maximum number of antibiotics that can be used in a hospital population or community, before resistance starts to increase.

Professor Ian Gould said: “In simple terms, it is commonly thought ‘the less antibiotics the better’ but this is not the correct approach as most of the restricted antibiotics are safe, effective and life-saving.

“It is important to understand how much of the life-saving antibiotics are actually associated with resistance itself.

“So rather than restricting use of these antibiotics as much as possible, on an arbitrary basis as it is done currently, this work identifies safe thresholds at which the antibiotics should be used without fuelling resistance.”

The study involved research teams from across Europe, using data gathered from five major hospitals and demonstrated that the method could be applied to a variety of different patients.

Dr Timothy Lawes, welcome fellow and senior registrar in paediatrics in NHS Grampian, added: “Normally, we think about the risk of antibiotic resistance in a linear way – so that more antibiotics equals more resistance – but our research took a different approach.

“Borrowing techniques from economics, our research had found a way to find these thresholds using simple data.

“It is hoped that our work could offer a way to balance the need to use antibiotics with the need to stop resistance in Scotland and around the world.”