Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

More than 24,000 crisis grants issued across the north and north-east in just one year

Post Thumbnail

More than 24,000 ‘crisis grants’ have been issued in just one year to vulnerable people across the north and north-east.

And it is suspected the true number of those in need could be far higher – with councils allegedly failing to advertise grant funds for fear they will be swamped by applicants.

The situation was revealed in a report into the Scottish Welfare Fund (SWF), which was set up in 2013 to provide non-repayable cash grants to people without food or other basics.

The report was led by charity coalition A Menu For Change and found the number of people forced to use foodbanks continues to grow.

In particular, there is growth in those seeking crisis grants, which help people “get through a disaster or emergency situation, such as running out of money for food”.

During 2017/18, Aberdeen City issued 10,665 crisis grants, Aberdeenshire 4,585 and Moray a further 2,565.

Highland distributed 4,330 crisis grants, while Argyll and Bute gave out 1,495, Shetland  225, Orkney 70 and Eiliean Siar 180.

In addition to publishing the stark figures, A Menu for Change have now raised concerns local authorities across Scotland are not actively promoting the SWF to thousands of vulnerable people who could benefit.

The report reads: “Based on interviews with those delivering the SWF, there is evidence that local authorities choose not to advertise the fund – not because they do not want people to receive their entitlements, but because they don’t feel they have the resources necessary to cope with the demand which advertising would create.”

The £38 million budget for the SWF has remained static since it was introduced in 2013, which amounts to a real-terms cut year-on-year, with many councils having to use “significant” amounts of their own funds to top it up.

David Hilber

David Hilber, project officer at A Menu for Change, said: “If you’ve run out of money, SWF should be there to ensure you can get cash to buy food and other essentials, but our research has found barriers along the way.

“Too few people know that the fund exists and councils say they can’t afford to properly advertise it because of the potential scale of the demand.”

A spokeswoman for Moray Council said: “We promote the Scottish Welfare Fund on the homepage of our website, within our access points, and within our Council Tax information leaflet.

“As well as this, we work with and promote the Fund through organisations and third parties who work with those who may experience a crisis. We also attend events like the Fairer Moray Forum and Tackling Poverty conference to advertise the Scottish Welfare Fund.

“As noted in the report, we’re the only local authority to offer four different application methods: online, by phone, paper or face-to-face.”

An ACC spokeswoman said: “The SWF is promoted on the ACC website and we have done a lot of work in terms of publicity over the years working with both internal and external partners and stakeholders.

“This has included visiting organisations and delivering presentations, attending community events and similar events.”