Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

U-turn on plans to remove crossing near HMT

Bill Cormie at the crossing near Union Terrace
Bill Cormie at the crossing near Union Terrace

Controversial plans to remove a pelican crossing in Aberdeen city centre have been put on hold after a U-turn from council bosses.

The local authority came under fire after announcing it was getting rid of the pedestrian link at Rosemount Viaduct, opposite His Majesty’s Theatre.

It later emerged that the City Centre Community Council and the independent Disability Advisory Group (DAG) were not consulted before the decision was taken.

Council officials said surveys showed that useage of the crossing is “minimal”, and argued there would be no detrimental effect on road safety.

About £300 a year would be saved by removing the traffic lights.

However, safety concerns were raised by the community council and local ward members, who claimed that there was a potential for an accident.

A spokeswoman for the local authority confirmed yesterday that the plans would now go out to consultation before a new report is compiled for consideration by the enterprise, strategic planning and infrastructure (ESP&I) committee in September.

Rosemount and Midstocket councillor Bill Cormie said: “I was contacted by members of the disability advisory group, the local community council as well as older residents in the area to say they use that crossing a lot.

“Without it, there was a fear that somebody is going to get seriously hurt.”

The city centre community council previously wrote to ward councillors and the ESP&I committee convener Barney Crockett to express their disappointment at the lack of contact.

The letter said: “We are surprised that there was no kind of consultation done on this before a decision was made and feel that before any work is carried out a proper consultation takes place.”

Mr Crockett had defended the decision, arguing that the crossing was “hardly used”.

Yesterday, the council spokeswoman said: “Further surveys carried out at the site over an extended period confirm that there is no significant use of the crossing.

“Discussions are ongoing with the Disability Action Group.”

Over the course of six visits to the site by council staff, the average number of pedestrians crossing was 218.

An average of 84% of those crossed outwith the designated crossing area.

Of the remaining 16% who followed the route of the crossing, most crossed without pressing the push-button, the report said.