Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Aberdeen solicitor helped keep haulage firm on road after it caused woman’s death

MIchael Allan
MIchael Allan

Scotland’s traffic commissioner has launched a scathing attack on a solicitor who helped keep a haulage firm on the road – after it caused a young woman’s death.

Michael Allan “undermined” Joan Aitken’s vital public safety role by acting as a “front” for the business after beautician Christina Fraser was killed in a horrific accident.

Munro & Sons Ltd was shut down after the 24-year-old was crushed to death when a 30-tonne digger rolled off a transporter and hit the car she was a passenger in.

But suspicions were soon raised that Aberdeen-based criminal lawyer Mr Allan – who also owned his own transport company – was allowing Munros to continue operating under his name.

He assured Miss Aitken – who is the Traffic Commissioner for Scotland – that this was not the case.

But following a lengthy investigation and public inquiry, she found that he was helping the banned company operate undercover.

Last night, the Scottish Solicitors’ Discipline Tribunal (SSDT) ruled that Mr Allan had brought the industry into disrepute following its own investigation into the case.

The legal watchdogs have censured him, fined him £1,000 and ordered him to pay expenses – which could run into thousands of pounds.

Miss Aitken also criticised the lawyer for duping her and for furthering the business interests of people she had taken off the road to protect the public.

She said: “I remain professionally and personally disappointed that he breached the trust expected of him as an operator and as a Scottish solicitor.

“He undermined my vital public protection role.”

Last night, Mr Allan said he refused to accept that he had ever done anything wrong, and that he was never given a proper chance to plead his case.

He said he never appealed the commissioner’s decision because of the incredible costs involved, and that he was “furious” she had reported him to the SSDT for an offence she knew he had not had a proper chance to argue.

“It was a nasty move,” he said.

Mr Allan was disqualified from holding an operator’s licence for seven years in 2012 following a public inquiry.

Miss Aitken – who presided over the case – concluded that the solicitor had engaged in a “gross breach of trust” and also disqualified his company, MSA Logistics Ltd, from holding a licence for the same period.

She said that as a “practising solicitor” Mr Allan had appeared before the Traffic Commissioner before and represented licence holders on “numerous occasions”.

However, he failed to appear before the commissioner for his own hearing.

Mr Allan could have been struck off by the SSDT.

The body said he was guilty of professional misconduct by allowing his company – of which he was the “controlling mind” – to be shut down.

Mr Allan categorically denied having ever “fronted” such an enterprise, and claimed that the investigation into the case was sparked because officials had a vendetta against Munro & Sons.

He claimed that when the dates for his inquiry were announced, he told them he was busy covering a case in Edinburgh.

“But the case went ahead anyway,” he said.

“The traffic commissioner was told a number of times that I could not attend the inquiry on that date.

“She was asked to fix new dates but that was refused.”

Mr Allan said he was “absolutely furious” when he was initially found guilty, and subsequently reported to the SSDT.

“The inquiry went ahead without my company being represented,” he said.

“I decided not to appeal because of the huge expense.”

He said that despite being frustrated with the most recent development, he would accept the punishment in order to put the case behind him.

“I am sure they would have liked me to be punished more,” he said.