Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Calls to make north-east planning process more democratic

Councillor Hamish Partride
Councillor Hamish Partride

A councillor has called for Aberdeenshire’s planning system to be overhauled to prevent elected members blocking applications behind the scenes.

Troup member Hamish Partridge is urging the leaders of Aberdeenshire Council to consider a more “democratic” way to deal with planning applications.

In an open letter to co-leaders Alison Evison and Richard Thomson, Mr Partridge said: “I write to you today to ask you to look at changing the way Aberdeenshire Council deals with local planning applications to make them fair and transparent, taking all applications to an open public meeting with all the councillors within the appropriate area committee.

“This will allow the application to be decided in a proper and open way with scrutiny, and not just by two councillors out of a possible 10 or more.”

Under the local authority’s current rules, applicants submit their proposals to the planning department. If the plan fits with guidelines, it is passed to the three or four local ward councillors to decide.

Members can request that applications are discussed at a public meeting.

But in practice, this means the objections of just two councillors can sink an entire project.

Mr Partridge – formerly an SNP councillor until he broke away from the group in June – has called for all applications to be dealt with in public to encourage proper “scrutiny”.

He added: “The fact that two councillors out of three can decide the fate of a planning application which could be anything from someone’s dream house to the future survival of a business is completely unacceptable, how can this be a democratic and proper?”

The council is currently changing the way decisions are made with a shake-up of policy committees and more decision-making powers handed to local members.

Last night Mrs Evison said the governance review is “testament” to the council’s commitment to fairness, impartiality and transparency.

She added: “If there are ideas presented about how to improve this process, while maintaining the principles on which it is based, it is important to consider these in a similar way to how governance has been reviewed.”

It is understood Mr Partridge and Mrs Evison could meet this week to discuss the proposals further.