Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

‘If we get this wrong now, we’ve got it wrong for good’, Aberdeenshire councillors debate flood scheme

Stonehaven Flood Prevention work earlier this year. Picture by Colin Rennie.
Stonehaven Flood Prevention work earlier this year. Picture by Colin Rennie.

A multi-million-pound flood prevention scheme in Stonehaven was nearly stopped in its tracks yesterday.

The £26.6million scheme to protect Stonehaven was revealed last month and, under the plans, parts of the town’s sea wall and promenade could be raised, while the existing sea defences are upgraded.

But numerous concerns were raised about the raised sea wall locally, prompting councillors yesterday to consider taking no further action to protect the town.

Members of the Kincardine and Mearns areas committee discussed the proposals before they go to the infrastructure services committee who will present a final plan to Sepa next year.

Sandbags are handed out in Stonehaven as residents try to guard against flooding in 2016

Project engineer Graham McAllan told councillors yesterday that the feedback regarding the sea wall had been taken on board – and that the possibility of transparent material or lowered sections of walls outside businesses could be considered.

He added the preferred option was “subject to change.”

Councillors then raised concerns over a lack of groundwork investigations carried out – raising fears the study was “hurried” along in order to “get a foot in the door” to receive funding from the Scottish Government.

North Kincardine councillor  Colin Pike suggested Stonehaven would be in “grave danger” if the process wasn’t halted.

He added: “This is mother nature at work – no matter what we do that wall will not stop the water getting over.”

Stonehaven councillor Sandy Wallace then presented a motion for “no action at all” and warned: “If we get this wrong now, we’ve got it wrong for good.”

Sandy Wallace

Fellow ward councillor Wendy Agnew seconded the motion with the added amendment that subsequent investigations be carried out into other options – such as fishtail groynes.

However the pair were defeated as the committee voted in favour of Stonehaven councillor Sarah Dickinson.

She suggested the multi-million-pound scheme be supported, but with the idea that more could be done in the sea itself to protect the town, this in turn reducing the need for a raised sea wall.

The motion read: “The committee support taking action to address the flood risk in Stonehaven to achieve a 1/200-year flood protection level.

“This action recognises the potential need for an increase in sea wall height as a result of projected sea level increases.

“However, the committee asks that all defences at sea are maximised in order to ensure that the sea wall height is optimised at the lowest achievable level such that the promenade need not be raised.”

Mearns councillor Jeff Hutchison added: “Doing nothing is not an option – we can’t pass this problem on to further generations.”