Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

River Dee and local wildlife both at risk by development, say objectors

The plans for Braehead, on the south end of Banchory
The plans for Braehead, on the south end of Banchory

Campaigners have warned an Aberdeenshire housing scheme could endanger vulnerable wildlife and pollute the region’s largest river.

The Banchory-based Scolty Redevelopment group has spoken out against Sandlaw Farming’s plans for 400 homes at Braehead, Auchattie, south of the town.

The proposals are for 300 rented homes, 75 affordable homes and 25 assisted-living apartments, ranging from one-bedroom flats to five-bedroom homes.

Mike Adams, spokesman for Scolty Redevelopment, said members feared the drainage system proposed in the planning application would lead to pollution of the River Dee through run-off into one of its tributaries, the Auchattie Burn.

They are also concerned about the threat to protected species on the land, including pine martens, otters, badgers and red squirrels, as well as the visual impact on the Scolty woodlands, local roads and the town’s schools.

Mr Adams said: “It is our opinion that the urbanisation would have a severe impact on the local wildlife, woodland and the River Dee through the reduction of green space, woodland, water quality and a major increase in ground disturbance.

“The idea that a development of this scale and construction on this scale would not affect an area of conservation is hard for us to believe.”

Sandlaw Farming initially wanted to construct more than 700 homes on the site.

Mr Adams said his group was also worried the development could be the first phase in a larger scale vision for the area.

“It’s not that we are anti-development, we are against unnecessary development,” he said.

“They have reduced the amount of land they are building on but increased the housing density.”

However Colin Liddell, spokesman for Sandlaw Farming, insisted “there is not a plan to go beyond” the development proposed.

He added: “Our development proposals will comply with all local and standard policies on drainage and sewage.

“An independent specialist has looked at all aspects of wildlife and diversity and found there would be insignificant impact on species except for one bat species.

“We’re actually trying to address what people need and what we’re quite clear about is people need housing.”