Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

First phase of £140million Aberdeenshire housing scheme backed by councillors

New artists impression of the proposed £140 million development at Blackdog.
New artists impression of the proposed £140 million development at Blackdog.

The first phase of a £140million proposal to build hundreds of homes in an Aberdeenshire village was backed by councillors after a row yesterday.

Kirkwood Homes’ plan to develop land in Blackdog has been heralded as a “flagship” project in the Energetica Corridor, which promotes energy-efficient schemes from Aberdeen to Peterhead.

The bulk of the 600-home estate has been put on hold until the completion of the Aberdeen Western Peripheral Route (AWPR), but developers are eager to build a pilot project of 48 houses.

Members of the Formartine area committee voted to grant planning permission.

But the vote followed a heated debate which one councillor said descended into “farce”.

Mid-Formartine councillor Paul Johnston called on the developers to make wholesale changes to the layout they had proposed, to leave space for a community-run shop and build a path to the AWPR.

“If we don’t get it right at this stage, nothing goes right in the future and then you can only make minor changes,” he said.

But his proposal found no support among his fellow councillors, and committee chairman Rob Merson described his comments as unacceptable.

The Ellon and district councillor said: “It is not acceptable to go into this minutiae in a public forum – we cannot redesign the whole development. You have failed to convince this committee.”

His comments were echoed by Turiff councillor Anne Robertson, who said: “We’re not planners, we’re not designers, and it worries me we’re getting into this level of discussion. We have to judge it on what’s in front of us.”

When Mr Johnston continued his argument, she added: “This is a farce.”

Kirkwood Homes has agreed to provide the statutory requirement of 25% affordable homes – a move they were praised for making “without quibble” – but the committee questioned why the properties had been “shoved in one corner”.

Mrs Robertson suggested if they cannot be integrated throughout the whole development, then the design of the affordable homes should not make them stand out from the other houses.

The site also has allocations for a primary school, employment land and other facilities. The second phase could see the remainder of the homes built, post 2017.