Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

£16million Mearns flood protection scheme could be amended

The aftermath of the 2012 floods in Stonehaven
The aftermath of the 2012 floods in Stonehaven

Stonehaven’s long-awaited £16million flood defence scheme may have to be revised due to a string of objections from locals.

Members of Aberdeenshire Council’s infrastructure services committee will next week discuss the proposals, which have received 11 objections from residents.

The plans have been drawn up in response to severe flooding to homes and businesses in the town in 2009 and 2012, caused by the River Carron bursting its banks.

Councillors will next week be asked to make a preliminary decision on the proposals.

But concerns have been raised that the scheme would have a detrimental visual impact on Stonehaven, with some worried about the erection of masonry walls along the Carron in the town.

The plans also include modifying the bridges along the river.

One objector, who has been flooded in the past, described it as an “extravagant scheme” adding: “The scheme as proposed is far more extensive and damaging to the amenity of the town than it needs to be and fails to address the reasons why the lower parts of the river do not always manage to contain the flow of water.

“It includes no efforts to hold water back from entering the town, thus requiring these ugly concrete walls which should simply not be needed.

“In short, we would be destroying the green heart of the town, for no good reason.”

Council officers are now considering modifying some of the proposals with the view to eliminating the concerns.

A spokesman said: “Officers involved in the project entered into negotiations with some objectors to try to address the issues they raised and if possible, modified the proposals to reach a suitable solution for all parties.”