Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Campaigners question economic claims of Coul Links developers

Dr Tom Dargie is campaigning against the Coul Links plans
Dr Tom Dargie is campaigning against the Coul Links plans

Campaigners fighting plans for a new “world class” golf course in the Highlands have questioned the economic impact claims of the developers.

Professor Gordon Hughes, commissioned by Not Coul chairman Tom Dargie, argues the number of visitor rounds played in the first year at Coul Links by Embo would be 7,500, half that estimated in a Biggar Economics report submitted on behalf of US businessman Todd Warnock and golf course developer Mike Keiser.

The Biggar report estimates that 250 indirect jobs would be created and £60 million generated for east Sutherland after the first decade, based on visitor rounds starting at 15,000 a year and rising to 20,000 by year 10.

SEPA withdraws Coul Links objections

But professor Hughes, commissioned by Not Coul campaign chairman Tom Dargie, argues that half of the 20,000 rounds a year at Dornoch are played by guests and visitors, and that it would be unlikely that Coul would attract twice the number of full fee-paying visitors to a new course with higher fees and less history.

And the former University of Edinburgh professor described the Biggar report as “spurious,” adding: “It claims substantial economic benefits for a relatively small project, when any careful and independent economist would be likely to come to the conclusion that the net impact will be small at best.”

Ecologist Mr Dargie also highlighted previous economic analysis by Steve Westbook, director of UHI’s economic intelligence unit, who found that after year five at Coul Links there would be 79 jobs – less than half of the 175 estimated by the Biggar report over the same time.

Mr Dargie, who is opposing the plans primarily because part of the golf course would encroach a dune system of Special Site of Scientific Interest, said the solution would be to build the course on adjacent agricultural land.

But yesterday Mr Warnock said: “Mr Dargie continues to fail to understand the fundamental elements of this project. We must build a world class golf course and that can not be done on agricultural land.

“If we build a world class golf course the 20,000 visitors playing Royal Dornoch will spend the night and if they spend the night, good things will happen.”

Mr Warnock also stressed that the proposals would still be “transformational” under Westbrook’s upper economic prediction, which would equate to about half of the £60 million predicted by the Biggar report after 10 years.

Mr Warnock also said that neither professor Hughes or Mr Westrbook understand the success of Mike Keiser’s other golf courses at Bandon Dunes in Oregon and Cabot Cliffs in Nova Scotia, which he says have “transformed these remote communities” by creating hundreds of local jobs.

Mr Warnock added: “We continue to be humbled and strengthened by the overwhelming majority of locals that support this golf course. Mr Dargie continues to reach for straws.”