Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner.

Family of Fort William heart attack victim successfully sue GP for failing to diagnose health problem

The Court of Session in Edinburgh.
The Court of Session in Edinburgh.

The family of a man who died from a heart attack have been awarded damages from a “negligent” doctor who failed to properly diagnose his health problems.

Relatives of William Brown sued Dr Alison Smith and her fellow GPs at the Craig Nevis Surgery in Fort William after their loved one passed away on January 6, 2011.

Mr Brown’s wife Euphemia, his children and his brother and sister instructed lawyers to go to the Court of Session in Edinburgh.

Doctor at centre of Fort William court case offers family her condolences

They claimed that Dr Smith failed to diagnose that Mr Brown was suffering from unstable angina when he attended at her practice on December 31, 2010, failed to refer him to hospital and failed to prescribe drugs which would have helped his condition.

Mr Brown’s relatives also claimed that it was cold on the day Mr Brown suffered his heart attack and that this weather could have triggered the cardiac arrest.

Judge Lord Armstrong yesterday ruled in favour of the family.

He wrote: “I find that Dr Smith was professionally negligent and breached the duties of care which she owed to the deceased, in that on Friday December 31 2010, she i) failed to diagnose unstable angina, ii) failed to refer him immediately to hospital iii) failed to provide appropriate worsening advice and iv) failed to prescribe the medication appropriate for a diagnosis of stable angina.

“I am satisfied, given my findings in relation to the agreed issues, that it is proved that these failures were materially causative of death, in that their consequences were that the deceased was denied the appropriate treatment which, on the balance of probabilities, would have reduced his level of cardiac ischaemia to the extent that ventricular arrhythmia would have been prevented.

“I find in addition, that in any event, if the fatal cardiac event on Thursday January 6 2011 was caused by exposure to the cold, as a pro vocational trigger, her failures were responsible for him being denied the protection from such exposure which admission to hospital would have provided.

“For these reasons, I find in favour of the pursuers.”

The exact sum awarded to the family has not been disclosed.

Lord Armstrong added: “If, on Friday December 31 2010, Dr Smith had prescribed beta blockers or an appropriate alternative, the deceased would have had the benefit of their anti ischaemic effect.

“On the basis that their maximum effect would have been in place within about three days, the likelihood of a fatal cardiac event, the principal cause of which was ischaemia, would have been significantly reduced.”

A spokeswoman for the Medical Protection Society, who responded to a request for comment from the medical practice, said: “We are reviewing and will issue a statement as soon as is possible.”

Already a subscriber? Sign in