Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner.

Search for Nessie continues as scientists throw up ‘no extraordinary evidence’ of monster’s presence

A scientist in charge of an extensive DNA study on Loch Ness has found no evidence to support the theory of a ‘Jurassic-age reptile’.

But Professor Neil Gemmell of Otago University, has confirmed that a large eel could provide a “plausible explanation” for the continuing allure of the monster which attracts visitors from all over the world.

A total of 250 samples of water were taken and analysed in June last year and compared against a global DNA database.

The findings have produced a comprehensive picture into life in the loch, but have not provided any concrete evidence to suggest a monster’s existence.

Professor Neil Gemmell of New Zealand’s University of Otago delivered the findings to members of the world’s media in Drumnadrochit yesterday. Picture by Chris MacLennan

Prof Gemmell said: “We can’t rule everything out definitively, but what we can say is that from the sampling that we did, we didn’t find any evidence of reptilian DNA or plesiosaurs and we didn’t find evidence of giant catfish or sturgeons, but we might have just missed those.

“Maybe they are rare enough that we just didn’t sample them and that is a statistical probability. Science is seldom definitive.

“We can’t say just because we didn’t find it that something isn’t there.

“Extraordinary claims need extraordinary evidence and we haven’t got extraordinary evidence of anything being there at the moment.

“This is another page in the Loch Ness history. People who believe in Nessie will continue to believe in Nessie and that is perfectly fine.”

Prof Gemmell admitted he is a “sceptic who is willing to be proved wrong”.

But Steve Feltham, a man who has devoted much of his life to searching for the famed creature is Steve Feltham, was scathing about the professor’s findings and described the study as “something that a 12-year-old boy could do”.

Steve Feltham has devoted over 28 years to searching for the mythical beast. Picture by Chris MacLennan

He added: “Anyone who casts a fishing line into Loch Ness can tell you that there are eels in there and that doesn’t take us anywhere. What I am more interested in is the things that his research has failed to prove and find.”

He said there has been numerous sightings of seals, but the samples found no trace of seals.

He added: “So, in the same way he is saying no catfish, no reptile or no sturgeon, well if he can’t find seal DNA, then his work leaves more questions unanswered than answered. The hunt will go on. This doesn’t really answer anything.

“I think this is a professor from the other side of the world, who doesn’t believe in Nessie, wanting to make a name for himself doing what he is a specialist at and he has successfully done that.

“But I don’t think it takes us much further than we were before today.”

Prof Gemmell conceded that some evidence from the sampling remains unknown.

Already a subscriber? Sign in