Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner.

Call to halt £420,000 plans for 12-mile fence to keep deer away from Highland estate

Post Thumbnail

Locals claim that £420,000 plans to erect a 12-mile fence around Highland woodland to keep deer out have been formed “behind closed doors” so that they could not object.

The Eisg Brachaidh revival project in Sutherland aims to restore habitats featuring “irreplaceable” old woodland.

The plan includes building a fence around the 5,000-acre estate to keep deer out and has secured more than £420,000 from Scottish Natural Heritage (SNH) and Woodland Trust Scotland.

Project leaders say that, while it can be difficult to predict the knock-on effect of deer movements elsewhere when an area is fenced, the impacts can be managed.

But in a letter to Scottish Ministers and local politicians, Assynt Community Council has called for the project be deferred for at least three months so that the risks can be weighed up.

Members believe the plan could exacerbate a major problem in Assynt and elsewhere, with deer displaced by other plantations being fenced off.

The letter states: “This is not the first time SNH has shown a complete disregard for the local community by failing to consult with those who are directly impacted by their actions.

“It’s clear they have given full support to yet another local project that could well result in further displacement of the existing deer herds without community consultation.”

David Davies, owner of the neighbouring Inverpolly Estate and chairman of the Coigach- South Assynt Deer Group, also called for the project to be delayed.

He said: “There has been no consultation whatsoever on this initiative which plans to put almost 12 miles of deer fence right in the heart of our most important landscape area”.

He said the project was developed “behind closed doors under the cover of Covid lockdown”.

Mr Davies added: “There is no transparency or due process involved, and all those organisations charged with protecting landscape, bird life, archaeology, access, deer management and local community interests appear to have been bypassed in the rush to spend this money.”

He said while investment to improve the natural heritage should be encouraged, local people “need to have a voice”.

George Anderson, of Woodland Trust Scotland, said the project has been discussed for several years.

But he added: “If the community council feels people need more information then we defer to its judgement.”

Mr Anderson said more details will be circulated and a community drop-in session being arranged in early September.

A SNH spokesman said the site had been discussed for “a number of years” and added: “We expect that the Woodland Trust will continue with this local discussion as the scheme progresses, and comply with statutory requirements for a scheme of this type prior to work commencing.”

Already a subscriber? Sign in