A lawyer who admitted finding evidence from a young girl in a child sex abuse case ‘titillating’ has been struck off.
Kevin Macpherson, 45, also made a young female trainee feel like a ‘sex toy’ after discussing her with another woman in a string of sexually charged emails.
The shamed solicitor took a ‘shine’ to the trainee, known only as TS, and began begging her to join him for dinner, take part in social activities with him and sent her 136 text messages outwith office hours.
During routine IT work, a colleague at a law firm in Stornoway found Macpherson had been exchanging emails with another woman, known only as Ms D, where they had discussed sex and TS in explicit detail for more than two years.
He said she was his only ‘stimulation’ in life and described her as ‘elegant’ and said in one message he had a ‘good view’ of her chest.
Ms D reported him to a legal watchdog after he sent her twisted messages relating to evidence in a child sex abuse case he was working on in 2012.
Macpherson, of Stornoway, told Ms D in an email ‘you would have loved what I was reading this morning’ before adding ‘a statement of a little girl talking about what she saw in a gym’.
She contacted the Scottish Children’s Reporters Administration in August 2013 and he was referred to prosecutors who ruled no criminal action should be taken against him.
A panel at the Scottish Solicitors’ Discipline Tribunal (SSDT) heard Macpherson, who has been a solicitor since 1998, admit he found the statement from the girl ‘titillating’ and ‘sexually gratifying’.
Macpherson, who latterly ran his own kfmLAW firm on the island, also admitted misconduct towards the trainee between March 2011 and August 2013.
His lawyer, David Burnside, said he had an ‘honest and upstanding’ reputation on the Isle of Lewis and being struck off would be a ‘significant’ blow to him because he would have to give up his business and relocate.
He also claimed Macpherson, who attended the hearing, had shown ‘remorse’ and admitted his misconduct.
The SSDT found him guilty of professional misconduct by engaging in an improper course of conduct towards the trainee and making reference to the young girl’s evidence.
In a written ruling, the SSDT said: “The tribunal considered that strike-off was the only appropriate sanction.
“The respondent admitted that he found the sexual abuse of children titillating, sexually gratifying and had used those conversations to further a sexual conversation.
“Employees, colleagues and clients were therefore at risk.
“This conduct in particular was a danger to the public and was likely to seriously damage the reputation of the legal profession.
“He demonstrated no insight into his conduct or how he would deal with such a situation differently in the future.”
No concerns were raised over the standard of Macpherson’s legal work.
