Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Planning blunder leads to houses being too close

Post Thumbnail

A council blunder has left an Argyll woman “just about able to pass a cup of sugar” to a property being built next to her home.

Ann Colthart of Connel, by Oban, says her privacy has been destroyed and has called for the new building to be demolished.

Argyll and Bute Council has apologized after Plots 3 and 4 at 12 St Oran’s Place were built 29ft (nine metres) away from Duriehill, Ms Colthart’s home.

Guidelines in the council’s own development plan state the houses should be 39ft (12 meters) apart.

Work was halted in May after Ms Colthart complained to the council about the proximity of the two semi detached houses to her 300sqft extension.

She said: “The extension to my home has been there since 2002. It’s my living room and now there is a new house built right next to it. You could just about pass a cup of sugar between the windows. My privacy has been destroyed and the stress is becoming unbearable.”

Ms Colthart asked the planners to get the houses demolished.

The planning department asked developer MacLeod Construction to halt the works and submit an new application with mitigation measures.

These proposals, to by considered by Argyll and Bute Council’s planning committee today, include alterations to the window layout of the new properties and the inclusion of a wall and hedging.

Ms Colthart has objected to planning application, along with Connel Community Council and 42 other villagers.

She said: “These cosmetics are completely unacceptable to me. The planners should never have given consent to allow these buildings to be so close to my home. They ignored their own guidelines and are now trying to waive them.”

Planning officers are recommending that permission be granted as a “minor departure” to the development plan. They advise a site visit should take place prior to a final decision.

A council spokesman said: “The developer obtained planning permission in 2014. In assessing the application a full site assessment was not undertaken.

“We would like to take this opportunity to apologise for this unfortunate situation and for any distress caused.

“We accept that we have fallen short of our own standards, as established in our local development plan, and we want to provide a remedy which is acceptable to all parties.”

Jane MacLeod of MacLeod Construction said: “The ordnance survey map that was used by our architect at the time of the planning application had no record of the extension existing. We were therefore unaware of any potential difficulty.”