Bird charity claims golf links threat to ‘amazing’ rare habitat

Coul Links, near Embo

A bird protection charity is the latest conservation organisation to object to plans for a new golf course at Coul Links in East Sutherland.

RSPB Scotland has called for a halt to the proposal for an 18-hole, championship course at Embo.

A petition against the development has been signed by more than 86,430 people, but developers claim they have the “overwhelming support of those who actually live in the area.”

Birds which populate Coul Links include wigeon, teal, curlew, drumming snipe and skylarks. A wide range of red and amber listed species of conservation concern nest amongst the dunes.

RSPB Scotland says the important wetland habitat would effectively be drained and replaced by golf greens, to the detriment of the birds.

The charity claims that plans to move the dune habitat would not be successful as it has taken thousands of years to form and cannot be artificially recreated.

Alison Searl, conservation officer at RSPB Scotland said: “There’s a reason why Coul Links is so heavily protected through national and European designations – it’s an outstanding place for nature and an incredibly rare habitat. It cannot be moved or replicated elsewhere; should these proposals be given the go ahead the amazing place would be lost forever and the impact on the birds currently found here throughout the year would be serious.”

David McAllister of Tain and District Field Club said: “Coul Links is alive with nature all year round and draws many people here to see it. We are very worried about what impact the golf course would have here.”

If approved, the course would stretch across an estimated 805 acres. The cost is estimated at £8million-£10million.

Chris Haspell, project manager for Coul Links, said: “Detailed studies have taken place at Coul Links in relation to the potential impacts of the proposed development. SNH and our team agree on this and these have simply been ignored by the RSPB in their latest inaccurate and inexplicable comments. The development touches on less than 2% of the overall site.

“Far from destroying this important habitat, the Coul Links proposal represents the only funded management plan to prevent the site being lost.”