Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Wind masts refusal overturned by reporter

Dava Moor
Dava Moor

A windfarm developer has won its appeal against refusal of permission for two met masts on a Highland moor.

Vattenfall will install the two temporary anemometer masts at Dava Moor with a view to erecting turbines on the site.

The application for the full scheme, which is four miles north of Grantown, could now be lodged by the end of next year.

The site is close to the boundary of the Cairngorms National Park where windfarms are banned.

Highland Council voted 13-2 to reject the 295ft masts plans in April because it would spoil the “desolate” landscape.

The company lodged their appeal to the Directorate of Planning and Environmental Appeals in July.

But now reporter Michael Cunliffe has overturned the council’s decision, stating that the landscape and visual effects of the scheme would be minor, including limited visibility from the A940 Grantown-Forres road.

He said: “This is a large-scale landscape which in my view is capable of absorbing a structure of this kind without significant adverse effects.”

Referring to the number of representations to the council he added: “Insofar as some of them appear to be motivated by concern about a possible future application for a windfarm, which would have much greater impacts, I am required to judge the present appeal proposal on its merits and without regard to possible future developments.”

But there was also some good news for the council – they do not have to pay Vattenfall’s costs for bringing the appeal after the reporter said that the council had not acted in an unreasonable manner by refusing permission.

Vattenfall had argued that the council’s conduct was unreasonable because the appeal has incurred unnecessary expense in having to produce maps to demonstrate the masts’ impact on the landscape.

Frank Park, Vattenfall’s project manager for the Ourack Wind Energy Project, said: “Vattenfall is pleased that the reporter has upheld our appeal.

“We will continue to work closely with local residents as we shape the Ourack wind energy project.

“It can kick-start significant local investment and job creation. This decision to uphold our appeal brings that day closer.”