Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Caithness turbines scheme could threaten RAF Lossiemouth’s radar

Typhoon Jet taking off at RAF Lossiemouth.
Typhoon Jet taking off at RAF Lossiemouth.

Councillors have been urged to throw out plans for three wind turbines in the Highlands – because they could jeopardise the radar system 40 miles away at RAF Lossiemouth.

The developer Wind Harvest Ltd wants permission to erect the 240ft structures at the Hill of Lychrobbie, Dunbeath, Caithness.

The scheme has attracted public support, in part because two of the proposed turbines would be financed, constructed and operated on behalf of the Berriedale and Dunbeath community, with all profits paid to a local interest group.

The application was first considered by councillors in April last year, but was deferred to try to iron out concerns, including an objection from the Ministry of Defence (MoD).

Military chiefs oppose the scheme because they say it will cause “unacceptable interference” to the Air Traffic Control radar service at RAF Lossiemouth, despite being almost 40 miles away over the Moray Firth.

The MoD insists that it will not reconsider its objection unless the applicant puts forward a “radar mitigation solution”, but this has not been forthcoming.

Members of Highland Council’s North Planning Applications Committee will consider the plans again at a meeting on Tuesday.

Officials have recommended that the councillors reject the application, saying: “In this instance the MoD objection to the planning application must be taken at face value, and whilst the applicant disagrees with the position set out by the MoD, its objection must still be treated as a serious and significant concern which remains unresolved.

“In particular it is noted that the MoD have stated that the development has been given the utmost scrutiny and that the objection has been thoroughly considered.

“As such it is evident that the air safety issues have not been resolved.

“The MOD also detail that only circumstances where an acceptable mitigation solution has been presented, can they remove their objection.”

The report added that the council was supportive of renewable energy schemes, but that it was “regrettable” that “no alternative options have been examined or presented” by the applicant since the proposal was last considered.