Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Dramatic reduction in estimated cost of Caol link road

Councillor Brian Murphy at the proposed site of the Caol link road
Councillor Brian Murphy at the proposed site of the Caol link road

The estimated cost of building a Caol link road has fallen by at least £21million after council officers were told to have another look at the figures.

Cost estimates for the much-needed link road, which would bypass a section of the busy A82 Inverness to Glasgow trunk road, were given in a transport background paper accompanying the West Highland and Islands Local Development Plan.

This document showed the cost of a new road between Inverlochy and Caol to be between £54.2million and £78million.

But a new version of the paper puts the cost at £35million to £50million.

For Lochaber chairman Duncan Brown previously pointed out that the estimate for the Caol link road was higher than the Inverness West link road, which is costing £43.35million.

And he suggested the Lochaber figure had been put unrealistically high to make it look less attractive.

Mr Brown yesterday said: “I stand by that suggestion.

“There has been a dramatic change in the figures and I wonder what underlies it.”

Councillor Brian Murphy, Fort William and Ardnamurchan, explained that local members demanded the original document was withdrawn from the development plan consultation because of a “number of inaccuracies and unsubstantiated assertions”.

The updated version of the report is now back on the Highland Council website as part of the consultation.

Mr Murphy said he was concerned about the dramatic change to the figures.

He said: “It doesn’t give you much confidence in how they were arrived at.”

He added that he did not have any confidence in the report and called for it to be withdrawn again.

Lochaber Committee leader Councillor Thomas MacLennan said he was “at a loss to explain the wild fluctuations in the costs for Caol link road”, which they had been told two years ago would cost £25 million.

He said: “This link road has been talked about for over 30 years and practically nothing has been achieved.

“The time has come to make decisions on an affordable, attainable and achievable solution to Fort William’s traffic problems, which doesn’t involve us waiting decades.”

A Highland Council spokeswoman pointed out that transport background papers were required by Scottish Government guidance to accompany local development plans.

She said: “The purpose of the paper and plan is to stimulate local discussion and comment.”

And she urged local people to read the available material and to comment before the June 10 deadline.