Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Probe into plans for a new retail park in Inverness gets underway

Craig Latto of engineering consultancy Arup
Craig Latto of engineering consultancy Arup

A traffic expert was questioned at length yesterday at the start of an inquiry into plans for a new retail park at Dell of Inshes in Inverness.

The planning hearing at the Kingsmills Hotel, under Scottish Government-appointed reporter Robert Maslin, follows an appeal by the developer Corran Properties.

Its proposals for planning in principal for a 50,000sq ft retail development were rejected by Highland Council earlier this year on the grounds that the planning application failed to cater for adequate local road improvements and that the development would exacerbate congestion.

The plan, involving new shopping outlets between Tesco at Inshes and the A9, was first lodged in 2013.

Council officials refused the application on the basis that it would contravene the local development plan and design brief for the Inshes area, and fail to provide vital road upgrades.

Council planning officer Nicola Drummond had pointed to significant changes required to the Culloden Road bridge over the A9.

Opening inquiry witness, Craig Latto of engineering consultancy Arup, was questioned initially by QC James Findlay, representing the developer, who referred to criticism the council had made of the expert’s traffic assessment for the project.

Mr Latto denied failing to take into account the full extent of University of the Highlands and Islands traffic in a 2013-14 report he prepared.

He also produced evidence showing that, under an agreement with council transport officers, it was his understanding that he was only expected to provide a “certain element” of such data.

Mr Latto showed the reporter an email from council officer John Danby to that effect.

Evidence was also shown to the reporter that Mr Latto had subsequently updated his traffic assessment.

A number of residents in the area objected to the proposed development fearing the loss of green space as well as additional traffic.

The inquiry continues today and is expected to end tomorrow.

All parties involved in the hearing will have the opportunity to submit written submissions to the reporter who will make his ruling at a future date.