Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Leading academic slams controversial Culloden housing development

Battle with Highland Council to protect Culloden are Grant MacGregor. Andy McAlindon and Steve MacLennan.
Battle with Highland Council to protect Culloden are Grant MacGregor. Andy McAlindon and Steve MacLennan.

A leading military historian has described a controversial housing development near Culloden battlefield as “akin to burning an archive.”

The remarks by Professor Christopher Duffy are to be delivered in his lecture titled “are we going to lose Culloden?”.

The National Trust for Scotland (NTS) released some of the remarks in advance of the event which they will host at the battlefield visitor centre tomorrow.

Professor Duffy will argue the 16 homes will “destroy” much of what makes Culloden so special and open the door to new developments.

He said: “These new homes have established a precedent for further development at Culloden – it can now be opened up and exploited bit by bit, leading to its gradual degradation.

“It’s very rare to find a battlefield that is so similar to when the fighting actually took place. Culloden is remarkable in that the site is still 90% intact from 272 years ago.

“However, these homes are going to result in highly-cluttered views and destroy the atmosphere surrounding the battlefield.

“If we’re not careful, we could end up with another instance of what the Americans call ‘Central Park’ syndrome – a patch of green, surrounded by intrusive development.”

Diarmid Hearns, Head of Policy at the NTS, said: “The approval of these homes has exposed major flaws in our broken planning system.

“We have said before that we strongly feel this is the wrong move for Culloden and we are deeply disappointed at the process’s failure to protect this important site from the threat of development.”

Local councillor Andrew Jarvie said: “While the council previously decided that it did not want houses here for the very reason that Professor Duffy states, The Scottish Government Reporter overturned that. All the council can do now is to ensure that the houses that do go there comply with policy 10 of the Culloden Muir Conservation Area, meaning they must be built with traditional materials. On the 13th of March a majority of the committee members did not agree that this design met that. Unfortunately two councillors pressed the wrong button at the vote and allowed planning permission, it is now up to the EDI committee to take a fresh view of this on May 17.”

The campaign saw more than 80,000 people sign an online petition against any development near the battlefield.

The Highland Council originally refused planning permission but a Scottish government reporter reversed that decision.

Developer Kirkwood homes did not provide a comment.