Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Protesters gather in bid to halt Culloden Battlefield home development

Protesters linked hands around the perimeter fence of the development. Picture by Andrew Smith
Protesters linked hands around the perimeter fence of the development. Picture by Andrew Smith

Protesters gathered at the site of a controversial housing development near Culloden Battlefield at the weekend in their latest attempt to halt the project.

Work on the 16 homes at Viewhill began last month.

But campaign group Stop Development at Culloden (GSDC) are not prepared to give up on their five-year battle against the development, and gathered on Saturday to once again make their feelings known.


>> Keep up to date with the latest news with The P&J newsletter


About 100 protesters gathered on Saturday, marching from the car park of the visitor centre to the development site before making a human chain to emphasise their will to protect the historic site.

George Kempik, from the group said: “This is a final attempt to awaken people to what is actually been happening here for the last five years.

“This has been the best turnout we have ever had and it is a bit ironic it is happening today when we look around and they have actually started building the houses.

Protesters gather 72,000 signatures against development near Culloden

“We are sending out a message to the property developer that we are still watching and the same applies to other developers who are planning on building houses inside this perimeter.

“This really is an injustice. It is a fairly large scale development of 16 houses and to even describe it as having no different impact on the battlefield than the sheds that stood before is completely wrong.”

The development has been the scene of much controversy over the years, and was approved upon appeal by the Scottish Government.

Opponents gathered 100,000 signatures from around the world for their petition calling for a rethink on the proposals.

Mr Kempik added: “I am really gutted. I am very angry and I am also sad and in disbelief that we have been put in the position, ordinary people have been put in the position, of having to do what we are doing and we shouldn’t need to do this.”

Last night, a spokeswoman for Historic Environment Scotland, which protects Scotland’s historical sites, stressed the Viewfield development would not have a “significant impact” on the battlefield or the underlying archaeology.

She said: “Culloden was added to our inventory of Historic Battlefields in 2011.

“The inventory boundary defines the area in which the main events of the battle are considered to have taken place and where associated physical remains and archaeological evidence occur or may be expected.

“Inclusion on the inventory does not preclude development, rather it means that planning authorities, in this case Highland Council, have to consider any proposals for development carefully, and determine whether development will significantly detract from the importance of the battle site.

“Planning permission was granted for residential development at Viewhill in 2014, by an independent reporter after the initial decision by The Highland Council was appealed.

“In the opinion of our predecessor body, Historic Scotland, the Viewhill development was considered not to have a significant impact upon either the battlefield landscape or the underlying archaeology, as the area was on a previously developed site and had already seen modern development.”