Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner.

Public inquiry into Strathy windfarm focuses on forestry effects

The Strathy South windfarm inquiry still has a lot of ground to cover.
The Strathy South windfarm inquiry still has a lot of ground to cover.

The focus of a public inquiry into a windfarm in the far north switched yesterday to the forestry created as the result of a highly controversial 1980s government policy of offering tax breaks for tree planting.

An inquiry that began in April resumed in the Sutherland village of Strathy in the heart of the fragile Flow Country, where power giant Scottish and Southern Energy (SSE) wants to build 39 turbines close to 33 it is already building.

The Strathy South scheme has become a battle of wills between SSE and environmental organisations including the bird charity RSPB Scotland.

Their respective legal teams yesterday thrashed out some of the arguments, but the signs were there was a lot of ground still to cover over the next two days before planning conditions could be outlined on Friday.

Shortly before proceedings resumed at Strathy village hall, a group of locals reaffirmed their support for SSE plans which promise substantial community benefits if the project is approved by the Scottish Government.

The day’s evidence featured further complex debate about peat before moving on to vegetation, habitat management and restoration of the landscape.

Aedan Smith of RSPB Scotland felt uncertainty remained about the potential impact on a range of important bird species and on the Flow Country peatland itself, although he said his organisation was in no doubt that the turbine proposal posed “some fairly major risks.”

There was unanimous agreement, however, that the promised removal of a significant swathe of forest would benefit the area.

Much of the forest planted in the 1980s proved an economic disaster in that it was not commercially productive.

“Thirty years on, some of it is commercially viable for extraction, but much of it isn’t,” Mr Smith said.

“It just wasn’t the right place to be planting trees really. The ploughing – for drainage – damaged the surface of the peatlands and the trees themselves add to the drying out effect of peatland that are fundamentally wet places.

“Nobody would have done it had it not been for the tax breaks.”

There was agreement on both sides that naturally stored CO2 is at risk of being released into the atmosphere because of the damage the trees have done.

An extensive restoration programme has been pledged if the turbines are approved.

Scottish Natural Heritage, which objects to the wind development, will outline its case today. (WED)


Already a subscriber? Sign in