Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Work on new £70million Nairn golf course could begin next year

Community council chairman Dick Youngson.
Community council chairman Dick Youngson.

Work on a long-planned £70million Nairn golf and 300-home development could finally get under way next year.

Plans for the project have been on the table for almost a decade, but now Cawdor Maintenance Trust have revealed they hope to start work late next year or early 2018.

Critics of the proposal are adamant, however, that vital infrastructure to support it is not in place.

The development is planned for land north of the A96 Inverness-Aberdeen route at Delnies, and features an 18-hole course, a luxury hotel, a tourism and heritage centre, equestrian centre and housing.

More than 500 pre and post-construction jobs could be created.

Last night Ken Bowlt, spokesman for Cawdor Maintenance Trust, said: “We’re hugely further on now than we were 10 years ago.

“We’re at the stage where we’re grinding our way through planning and it looks like the end is in sight – I would say the end of next year or early 2018 is a realistic starting time.”

He claimed that Nairn needed the development.

“The High Street is getting run down and there’s no footfall in the shops,” he said. “A lot of people are going to Inverness instead because it has the retail.”

Initial plans for the development were tabled in 2008. Outline planning permission was granted in 2012 and consent was granted last year.

However, the applicant wants to vary a condition to build a new roundabout off the A96 to access the site by instead building a “ghost island” T-junction for cost purposes, which has been refused by the council.

The trust lodged an appeal with the Scottish Government arguing that the junction would be suitable, and argued that reduced traffic flow from a proposed Nairn bypass would make it safer.

The agent for the scheme, Alan Farningham, of Farningham Planning Ltd, said: “If the condition isn’t removed it doesn’t mean that the development will not go ahead.

“From a technical point of view, there’s no requirement for a roundabout and we’ve proved that. We feel that we’re justified in making that appeal.”

Asked when work might begin, he said: “This appeal could take six months. It could be next year before the detailed plans go in.

“I would imagine it would probably be the end of 2017 or the beginning of 2018 before we’re on site.”

Last night Nairn Suburban and West Community Council chairman Dick Youngson said the Cawdor development was “a splendid idea,” but stressed that planned housing development should start first on the adjacent Sandown site, which is on Nairn common good land.

He added: “We feel development should really start in Sandown and then move westwards and incorporate the Cawdor development.

“There are going to be plans, perhaps a drip feed of houses, about 20 to 30 a year, building up to about 300 homes at Sandown. We don’t just want to build houses for developers to make a killing.

“We have to think carefully about development in Nairn and want to see a new Nairnshire local plan.”

Mr Youngson believes there should be a shared roundabout for both sites, as opposed to a T-junction.

Nairn Improvement Community Enterprise chairman Alastair Noble agreed with Mr Youngson on the need for an updated local plan.

He adding: “The whole thing is madness. What we have got is ageing infrastructure and sewage works and overcapacity.

“If they’re appealing that decision on the grounds to put in a roundabout will cost too much, it doesn’t bode well for paying for the provision of infrastructure. What they cannot do is expect the

Scottish Government, Highland Council or Scottish Environment Protection Agency to bail them out.”