Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner.

Calls to bury power line in Moray underground silenced by planning rules

An artist impression of what the 78ft poles will look like at Milltown of Auchindoun.
An artist impression of what the 78ft poles will look like at Milltown of Auchindoun.

Controversial plans to erect giant pylons to hook up a windfarm took another twist yesterday – when councillors had their objections silenced by planning rules.

Scottish Hydro Electric Transmission want to erect 78ft electric poles across the countryside to hook the 59-turbine Dorenell windfarm to the National Grid.

The cables will stretch for over 14 miles from the Dorenell turbines to the Blackhillock substation near Keith.

But Dufftown residents have united to fight the proposals, amid concerns they will spoil the landscape.

Yesterday, councillors were asked for their views on the plans, which will eventually be determined by the Scottish Government.

They also raised fears that the project could blight the landscape for decades – with senior councillor Allan Wright urging members of the planning and regulatory services committee to come out against the plans as not enough had been done to explore other options.

He said: “Developers always say undergrounding is so much more expensive than alternatives, but I have yet to see any estimates compared to having 135 of these pylons – that’s a lot.

“I would rather have the exact figures in front of me when making my decision, whether it’s two or three times more expensive or only 25%. I don’t know but I would like to know.”

Mr Wright added: “With overground cables the impact is there for 25 years. If it’s underground then it’s done and dusted and that’s an end to it.”

Buckie councillor Gordon McDonald joined the call to object to the power line while asking for more details about the cost of underground alternatives.

But legal officer Aileen Scott urged committee members to back away from an objection based on alternatives amid suggestions an inquiry could be triggered.

Chairman Chris Tuke repeatedly stated the cost of a development was not a planning concern.

Mrs Scott said: “You may have another prefer another option, but that isn’t what you are being asked to consider.”

Councillors were split during the lengthy discussions, with Speyside Glenlivet member Mike McConnachie backing the development and arguing underground cables could also harm the environment.

He said: “In an ideal world undergrounding would be the solution. Roads would have to be built though with hundreds of tonnes of rock being put down. That would be a scar on the landscape that would remain there.”

Committee members called for more time for information to be prepared but were told by planners a decision was needed at the end of the meeting.

Eventually a neutral stand point was agreed, neither supporting or opposing the plans while raising concerns about the lack of time to submit a response.

And last night leading protester Colin Mackenzie, who lives near Dufftown less than a mile from where the poles will be built, hailed the neutral stance as the best outcome.

He said: “Hopefully this will place some doubt in the mind of the Scottish Government when they’re looking at it. The case has been made for undergrounding and I don’t know why they won’t look at it.”

Last week, fears were raised by Marine Scotland that clearing land for the poles, which will be dropped into place by helicopter, could harm fish.

A SHE Transmission spokesman said the firm was committed to reduce visual impacts from the project while finding the most “economical solution”.

He said: “Following detailed consultation and site investigations the preferred option, based on technical efficiency, cost and environmental impacts, is to provide the connection to the between the wind farm and Blackhillock substation via twin composite poles running in parallel, which resemble wood poles.”

Already a subscriber? Sign in