Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner.

Controversial housing development in Moray approved despite concerns it could ‘destroy’ habitats

L-R: Annie Crawford, Jill Denton, Daphne Francis and John Atkinson.
L-R: Annie Crawford, Jill Denton, Daphne Francis and John Atkinson.

A controversial housing project has been approved despite concerns it could “destroy” the natural home of birds and plants.

The proposals split the community at the Findhorn Foundation, with 55 objections lodged with the council amid fears about over-population and traffic.

However, 11 also wrote to back the plans from developer Duneland as they believe the 38 homes, three commercial craft units and community facility are within the ethos of the enclave and would help support its vibrancy.

There was heated debate about the development potentially encroaching too far into the sand dunes in response to other projects by Duneland, with reports of “no more” being scrawled on signs in the area.

The local community council also suggested the Foundation was beginning to “sprawl”.

But yesterday, the authority’s planning committee backed the plans despite impassioned pleas from one member to protect the dunes which were described as of “local ecological importance”.

Forres councillor Claire Feaver said: “There’s nothing in the environmental impact assessment (EIA) statement that says this development will not be detrimental to the conservation status and habitat of species concerned.

“What this EIA statement tells us is how rich this area is  – we need to conserve it, not destroy it.

“Coastal dunelands are a very valuable and fragile wildlife habitat, which are under immense pressure all over Britain from commercial and recreational use.”

Concerns were also raised by Mrs Feaver about the effect on yellowhammers and linnets, which are on the “red list” for protected birds and who nest on gorse on the proposed housing site, as well as for lichen moss.

Duneland stressed that it was likely that both species of birds would relocate to neighbouring areas, and stressed measures would be put in place to minimise disruption.

Council planners confirmed the plans conformed with policies and that the site was within the defined settlement boundary of Findhorn.

Principal planning officer Gary Templeton told councillors the land had a “complex” history.

He said: “It was the subject of a local inquiry in 2008. The reporter at that time recommended the housing designation should be deleted, which it was.

“In our most recent local plan the site sits as white land within the settlement boundary as a potential windfall site. These sites make an important contribution to our housing land supply, in 2015 they accounted for 19% of all completions.”

Forres councillor George Alexander backed the application.

He said: “If we don’t build houses in this location we will be building them somewhere else. It’s of concern to me that we will have to build them on agricultural land which produces food.

“I don’t think the fact that we are displacing a tiny number of birds is justification for throwing out this application.”

Speyside Glenlivet councillor Louise Laing added: “I felt a bit uneasy about this application when we were at the site but SNH (Scottish Natural Heritage) aren’t against it – they are the experts we ask about these sorts of things.”

Moray Council’s planning committee approved Duneland’s application for planning permission in principal by seven votes to three. A condition was attached that if any detailed planning permission for the site is submitted then it would also have to be scrutinised by the committee.

Already a subscriber? Sign in

[[title]]

[[text]]