Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Plans to knock down a service station to make way for eight flats and a shop rejected by Moray councillors for a second time

Post Thumbnail

Proposals to demolish a garage to make way for a shop and housing has been described as “riding a coach and horses” through Moray Council’s planning policy. 

Members of the local review body today rejected an appeal to knock down a service station on Forsyth Street, Hopeman to make way for a shop, light industrial unit and eight two-bedroom flats. 

The planning application put forward by Springfield Real Estate Management on behalf of the Co-op, was refused at a meeting in March for breaching eight different policies in the local development plan and gaining more than 160 objections.

Senior solicitor Stuart Hoath told members a decision would have to be made on whether a hearing should be held following a request by the applicant, or if there was enough information in the near 800 pages of documentation for councillors to make a decision.

‘The developer is more or less asking Moray Council to rewrite its development plan’

Independent councillor for Speyside Glenlivet Derek Ross said: “We have a huge volume of material, I’ve read through it and I certainly feel I can make a determination. I don’t know what a hearing would bring to this. 

“At the end of the day it’s a relatively simple case, it’s not as complicated as the amount of paperwork we’ve got leads us to believe.” 

Councillor Derek Ross

Independent councillor for Forres George Alexander felt there was too may problems with the development for it to go-ahead. 

He said: “The impression I got was the developer’s agent was more or less asking Moray Council to re-write its development plan, because there’s so many examples where it’s riding a coach and horses through our planning policies. 

“One of the toughest things at the moment in our smaller towns is to revitalise the town centre. 

“To drop a supermarket right on the edge of Hopeman, that alone would make me wonder if it was a very wise move. 

“I don’t see how we can sit here and approve this appeal and even pretend we’re abiding by our own policies.” 

The site on Forsyth Street is earmarked in the development plan for business use with no shortfall of other suitable areas for housing available in the coastal town. 

Other breaches of policy include a poor design frontage for the retail unit, not enough parking bays, access problems for pedestrians and traffic and insufficient vehicle charging points. 

It was also felt the development would adversely impact on the distinctive character of Hopeman. 

‘There’s a tendency from the public to think the pandemic is over’

Conservative councillor for Keith and Cullen Donald Gatt suggested it would be useful for members to go and look at the site to help make a decision. 

He said: “This is a huge document that we’ve had to wade through and it’s not necessary as there’s lots of duplication.

“I’d like a site visit as they can be helpful, sometimes they’re not, but I think it would help in this case.” 

The beach at Hopeman. Picture by Jason Hedges

Legal services manager Aileen Scott said the council had made a decision to stop site visits during the pandemic and nothing had been done to change that policy.

Mr Alexander said: “I think it’s important to recognise the number of positive Covid cases is still on the increase. 

“There is a tendency from some members of the public to think this is all over but it’s far from being all over.” 

Members unanimously agreed to reject the appeal as recommended by officers.