Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner.

Drones to replace planning visits for councillors in cash-saving drive

Post Thumbnail

Moray Council is considering using drones to scope out planning sites as part of its drive to save money.

Local authority officers have floated the idea of sending remote-controlled aircraft to film land which has been earmarked for development.

They say that – in some cases – it would be cheaper than bussing councillors there in person.

When developers apply for permission to build, the local authority’s planning and regulatory services committee decides whether a site visit is required to make a ruling on their application.

But the idea of sending drones in their place has been included in a package of revisions to the existing system.

Last night, campaigners who have clashed with the local authority over major schemes criticised the proposal.

Gillian Priestly, who led opposition to a controversial road access project in Lossiemouth, said drones could not accurately convey the impact developments would have on their surroundings.

She said: “I think it’s a nonsense, a drone can’t get the sense of a place the same as a person can.

“Planning applications can affect people’s homes and lives – I don’t think this should even be considered.

“A drone couldn’t convey the noise pollution that developments would bring to quiet areas.”

Local authority planning officers have outlined cases where the devices could save the council money at a time when it is having to slash its spending.

They say sending a drone to film four or five plots would cost £550, including editing, which equates to four hours of members and officers’ time as well as the price of bus hire.

A trial film has been commissioned for councillors to view when they meet today at the local authority’s HQ in Elgin.

The footage details a 14-acre plot which Elgin Golf Club wants to adapt for use at its Glassgreen Driving Range site.

Members will also be presented with a report explaining that site visits often include as many as 10 committee members and can last for up to four hours.

Last year, elected members met to try to devise a new approach to tackling site visits.

In November, the committee took part in a workshop to look at “alternative options” to trekking to the areas they have to evaluate.

However, officers have also said it is “essential” that site visits remain an option for committee members.

Former Moray Council planning chief Donald Lunan backed the use of drones in assessing some applications.

Mr Lunan, who now works as an independent planning adviser, said: “Drone filming can be quite dramatic, and they could home-in on certain angles you would never get from a site visit.

“That could be really useful when evaluating large, remote patches of land such as those developers might want to build a windfarm on.

“I do believe councillors should still visit locations where a significant application is involved, or if a plan has caused controversy locally.

“But for more run-of-the-mill items, where using a drone could save money, it could be sensible to use one.”

If members agree that drone filming should substitute for site visits, then a further report will be submitted to the council’s policy and resources committee on the budget requirements.

Already a subscriber? Sign in