Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Environmental campaigner loses court battle after accusing north-east council of failing to clean roads

George Niblock (right) with other AEF volunteers
George Niblock (right) with other AEF volunteers

A former waste boss who accused Aberdeenshire Council of failing to keep streets clean has lost his court battle.

George Niblock, convener of Aberdeenshire Environment Forum, took the local authority to court with a litter abatement order.

The order allows a member of the public to force landowners to clean up litter hot spots.

Mr Niblock, who is a retired council waste boss, previously threatened to take the authority and the Scottish Government to court over the state of the streets, alleging years of neglect.

Solicitors acting on his behalf subsequently filed an order with the court, which focused on the condition of the A96 Aberdeen to Inverness road.

The order is specific to a near seven mile stretch of the road north of Inverurie, including the landscaped areas and verges adjacent to the carriageway.

Had the court order been granted, the council would have been required to clear any litter and refuse away within four weeks.


>> Keep up to date with the latest news with The P&J newsletter


Mr Niblock alleged the authority continually failed to clear rubbish from the route, and believed that mirrored failings elsewhere in the region.

A number of people gave evidence during the hearing, at Aberdeen Sheriff Court, including Mr Niblock and Philip McKay, the council’s head of roads.

The court heard that Mr Niblock had been campaigning for the council to address the perceived problem for eight years.

He presented 24 different photographs during the hearing, which he claimed showed litter and rubbish piled up along the route, along with overgrown foliage covering adjacent footpaths.

There was also pictures of animal carcasses, a fox and a badger, left on the road included in the photographs.

Mr McKay gave evidence that the authority complied with its statutory duties to clean streets but also said budgetary pressures prevented him from devoting any further resources to it.

It was also confirmed during the hearing that the responsibility of cutting back verges was with Bear Scotland, which manages Scotland’s trunk roads network.

Sheriff Andrew Miller, presiding, heard evidence from both sides and ultimately ruled in favour of the authority.

He ruled that the evidence did not show the problem was a “consistent one” along the route.

In his written decision, Sheriff Miller said: “For example, a number of the photographs relied upon by him which show the presence of litter at particular locations along the road also appear to show, where the angle permits, that such litter is localised rather than being, in any true sense, a consistent feature of this entire stretch of road.

“The same issue applies in relation to the evidence of the presence of dirt or detritus on the carriageway.”

A spokesman for Aberdeenshire Council said: “We welcome the fact that the sheriff refused to make a litter abatement order and was of the view that Mr Niblock had failed to prove his case.

“We were confident in our system of inspections and the way we allocate limited resources in this area, and it is therefore unfortunate that public money had to be used to defend this case

“We would like to use this opportunity to remind those travelling around the area to dispose of any litter responsibly, either using litter bins, or by taking rubbish home with them – our crews are subject to high levels of risk while litter picking in such locations, something which ideally would not have to happen at all.”

Mr Niblock could not be reached for comment.