Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

No-go for Strichen glamping pod plans

Aberdeenshire councillor Stephen Smith.
Aberdeenshire councillor Stephen Smith.

A north-east centre that helps adults with special needs has had plans to build glamping pods in its grounds rejected.

Howford Training had hoped to build the two structures at Howford, in Strichen, but council planners expressed numerous concerns.

Faced with what they said was a “lack of information” about the proposals and with the applicants choosing not to address councillors, the Buchan Area Committee felt it had no option but to reject them.

Planning officer Sally Wood presented the plans to members, noting the pods would be erected in what was once the front garden of a derelict but C-listed building.

She said the listed property was “central” to the site at Howford and the siting of the pods would have a negative impact upon it.

And she told members there were also concerns over parking and access to the site and the disposal of foul water, noting that a lack of information meant officials had been unable to adequately assess the impact of the proposals.

Councillors praised the good work of the centre – Jim Ingram among them – and said they might have been minded to approve the pods had there been more information.

But members eventually agreed to support a motion by Councillor Stephen Smith to reject the plan.

He said: “This is the sort of development in this area that we would want to support, if at all possible, and I think Jim made a strong case for the applicant.

“But here there’s a lack of information here.

“I think we should move to refuse so the applicant has the chance in the next 12 months to submit the information we require and then we can decide.”

Speaking after the meeting, Claire Greig, from Howford Training, said: “It’s disappointing but we’re going to have to walk away from the plans.

“The cost of it being near the listed property was becoming unmanageable.”