Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Boost for Buchan railway campaigners

Buchan Railway
Buchan Railway

Campaigners battling to re-open an old north-east railway line have been boosted by a new study into the potential impact of Aberdeen’s long-awaited bypass.

A report by Aberdeen and Grampian Chamber of Commerce has concluded that the multimillion-pound Aberdeen Western Peripheral Route will not “improve the attractiveness of Fraserburgh and Peterhead as business locations”.

The study, commissioned by Aberdeenshire Council, continues that “a further risk is that the AWPR acts as a development ‘magnet’ to the detriment of locations beyond it”.

Last night, Peterhead councillors said the Business Land Research Study added considerable weight to their campaign to have the Buchan area reconnected to the railway network.

The former Formartine and Buchan line has been the subject of debate in recent months after calls to have it be reopened and take freight off the A90 Aberdeen-Peterhead road.

Passenger services ceased in the 1960s and the line was closed to goods trains in 1979.

Stephen Smith, SNP councillor for Peterhead South, said last night: “The report provides very useful insights into business thinking and is an early warning that Peterhead cannot rely on the Aberdeen bypass to make it more attractive as a location for new businesses.

“Only by thinking strategically for the long-term will that happen, and I am more and more coming to the view that a rail link will be a vital component of how the town develops in the next 20-30 years.”

Mr Smith said that the report should be used as part of a recently announced feasibility study which is now being carried out by Nestrans.

Peterhead North independent councillor Alan Gardiner, added: “Let’s be clear that the AWPR will be a tremendous boost for Peterhead, both in terms of the journeys people make and the transporting of goods into and out of Peterhead by existing businesses.

“But this report is clear that the bypass in itself will not attract new businesses to the town and we therefore need to take every opportunity we can to make Peterhead more attractive and better connected.”

He added: “The Borders railway is due to be completed next summer and I expect we will see in the Borders what we have come to expect from every other re-opening of a railway track or station in the last 30 years: an economic boost to the area and a well used, modern facility.

“This report is therefore a welcome contribution to the feasibility study.”