Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Fraserburgh nursery rated ‘weak’ after an unannounced inspection

Happy Days Nursery in Fraserburgh.
Happy Days Nursery in Fraserburgh.

A nursery in Fraserburgh has been slammed by inspectors who rated its service as “weak” and questioned whether it was doing enough to keep children safe.

Happy Days Nursery, which operates from playrooms within Fraserbrugh Leisure Centre on Seaforth Street, was the subject of an unannounced visit by inspectors on November 14.

A report now published by the Care Inspectorate concludes the majority of services  at the nursery were “weak”.

Despite parents submitting positive comments about the flexibility of the service and how much their children enjoy it, inspectors found the quality of care and support, the staffing, management and leadership to need improvement.

The quality of environment was the sole area to be rated as anything other than weak, as inspectors found it to be “adequate”.

In their report, inspectors note that: “Staff did not always follow best practice to support children’s health and well being.

“Children were given bottles of milk in their cots to self-soothe before falling asleep.

“This did not support good dental health and children were at risk of choking.

“Systems to ensure medication was safely managed were not effective to support children’s health and well being needs.

“Children’s medical care plans had not been updated and staff were not aware of changes made to some plans.

“This meant staff were not fully informed to help keep children safe and well.”

It also added that play was not stimulating as it was adult led and did not encourage imagination, curiosity or creativity.

Happy Days Nursery is capable of caring for up to 30 children under the age of 12 from 8am to 5.30pm.

One parent asked for opinions on the service said: “I love the service. They are so flexible and accommodating to meet my needs.

“I can just ask the night before to cancel a session or add another.”

A second said: “The ladies are the real strength of the service. You are always greeted with a smiley face.”

But inspectors found staff lacked knowledge, skills and training.

They also claimed staffing levels were insufficient, leaving babies “crying and distressed” as there was only one member of staff between three babies.

The report placed requirements on the team to improve and continue training to ensure “children are protected from harm and neglect”.

Past inspections found the service to be of “good” or “adequate” quality, with this the first time Happy Days has seen any area branded “weak”.

Several recommendations and requirements have been left with staff to improve on before the next visit.

Happy Days manager Heather Campbell claimed the report did not fairly reflect the good work of the business or its staff.

She said: “I’m absolutely disgusted at how the inspection was handled.

“We’ve kept parents informed and told them what we think. We’ve also spoken to the inspector and she is planning to come back soon.

“As I wasn’t there I can’t say what happened, but I know and trust my staff who would have been very nervous and anxious to face the inspectors without me.

“I’m not disappointed, because none of us have done anything wrong and the parents are all happy.”

Ms Campbell added: “The report makes it sounds like we put all children down with bottles in their mouth, when that was one baby and the mother had asked for it.

“It may not be the best practice but he wasn’t left alone and I feel there really was no need to be nasty about any of it.”