Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Call for reform to end ‘secrecy’ of Scotland’s landowners

Post Thumbnail

Campaigners have stepped up calls for reforms that would finally lift the “veil of secrecy” that shrouds the identity of many of Scotland’s landowners.

In a new report, Community Land Scotland said the nation has an opportunity to take a “world-leading role” in guaranteeing land ownership transparency through new Holyrood regulations.

But the organisation, which represents the groups behind Scotland’s community buy-outs, said the benefits could be “limited” unless the opportunity is properly grasped.

Just 500 people own about half of Scotland’s land and it was revealed last month by the Press and Journal’s sister paper, the Sunday Post, that property and land worth £2.9billion was being held by companies based in foreign tax havens.

But the information can cost hundreds, if not thousands, of pounds to obtain from the Registers of Scotland, despite the equivalent data being free south of the border.

In her report for Community Land Scotland, researcher Poppea Daniel concluded: “There is a long history of land registration in Scotland and a presumption of public access to information about land ownership.

“However, there are some key factors which are compromising land ownership transparency in practice.

“The main, centralised register of land is incomplete and not integrated with other sources containing information about (for example) legal entities which own land.

“There is a gap as yet between the desire for a ‘publicly accessible’ land registry and the reality.

“Access for citizens to anything other than the most basic information is fragmented, expensive and complicated.”

She said the benefits of new land reform legislation could be restricted if this framework is not overhauled.

Calum MacLeod, Community Land Scotland’s policy director, said: “The report reveals weaknesses in the existing system for promoting transparency of ownership.

“It also shows that lifting the existing veil of secrecy on beneficial ownership of land in Scotland requires the new Register to be comprehensive in its coverage, responsive to the needs of users and, crucially, freely accessible by the public.”

A Scottish Government spokeswoman said it was “determined to improve the transparency of land ownership in Scotland.

“To enhance that we will shortly introduce regulations to Parliament for a new public register of controlling interests in owners and tenants of land.”