Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Alex Salmond’s straw man: Is Sturgeon inquiry rigged?

Alex Salmond campaigning with Nicola Sturgeon.

Alex Salmond has called for an independent investigation into whether Nicola Sturgeon broke the ministerial code to be broadened to include claims she misled Holyrood.

The former first minister made his plea in a letter to James Hamilton, the independent adviser to the Scottish Government who is investigating whether Ms Sturgeon broke the rules when she held meetings with Mr Salmond.

The investigation by Mr Hamilton, a former public prosecutions director in Ireland, is being conducted separately to the ongoing Salmond inquiry being carried out by MSPs at Holyrood.

Ms Sturgeon referred herself to Mr Hamilton’s standards panel in January last year after it was claimed she had broken the ministerial code by not promptly declaring meetings she had with Mr Salmond to discuss the harassment claims against him.

It might even be suspected that this remit has been set up as a straw man to knock down.”

Alex Salmond

The meetings were held while Mr Salmond was the subject of an internal Scottish Government inquiry into the complaints made by two women.

In his emailed letter to Mr Hamilton, Mr Salmond claims the remit of Mr Hamilton’s investigation, set out by Deputy First Minister John Swinney, laid “a surprising stress” on whether Ms Sturgeon had interfered in the Scottish Government’s internal investigation into the harassment claims.

“It might even be suspected that this remit has been set up as a straw man to knock down,” Mr Salmond said.

“There is no general bar on ministers intervening in a civil service process of which I am aware and indeed there are occasions when ministers are actually required by the code to intervene to correct civil service behaviour.”

When Sturgeon met Aberdein…

Ms Sturgeon has been accused by her political opponents of misleading the Scottish Parliament when she told MSPs of her meetings and contact with Mr Salmond, the first of which took place at her family home on April 2 2018.

When she notified parliament of the meetings in January the following year, she failed to disclose she had also met Geoff Aberdein, Mr Salmond’s former chief of staff, a few days before, on March 29 2018.

Geoff Aberdein.

In her evidence to the Salmond inquiry, the first minister said she forgot about the Aberdein meeting and added that she thought it did cover allegations of a “sexual nature”.

In his email to Mr Hamilton, Mr Salmond said: “What I wish to know is whether matters which, by contrast, are specified in the Ministerial code such as the primary responsibility of not misleading parliament (contrary to 1.3 (c) of the code), such as the failure to act on legal advice suggesting the government was at risk of behaving unlawful (contrary to 2.30 of the code), and such as the ministerial failure to ensure civil servants gave truthful information to parliament (contrary to 1.3 (e) of the code) will have at least equal status in your deliberations or are you confined to the political remit which you have been set?

“If your enquiry has been confined by ministers then please tell me if you have the authority to expand that remit unilaterally? If not, will you seek the authority of those in the Scottish Government who set the remit to expand it into these, and other, areas?”

Civil servant and deleted text

During the Salmond inquiry, several civil servants have corrected their evidence. Permanent secretary Leslie Evans apologised for giving inaccurate information about the role played by special advisers in the Scottish Government’s response to the judicial review brought by Mr Salmond.

Barbara Allison.

This week senior civil servant Barbara Allison corrected an “unintended inaccuracy” after initially denying she had received a text from Ms Evans on the day Mr Salmond’s judicial review was successful.

Ms Allison admitted she received the electronic message – which said: “Battle maybe lost but not the war” – but had deleted it.

Salmond inquiry: The civil servant, the deleted text and ‘the battle and the war’

In his letter, Mr Salmond also revealed he is representing himself in relation to Mr Hamilton’s investigation.

The former first minister said: “I am prepared to represent myself in presenting you with evidence. I am a private individual and simply cannot afford to hire further legal representation as my lawyers are fully occupied dealing with the Scottish Parliamentary inquiry.”

Further calls to expand inquiry

Earlier this month Alex Cole-Hamilton – a Lib Dem MSP and a member of the Holyrood committee that is also looking into the handling of complaints against Mr Salmond – also called for Mr Hamilton’s inquiry to investigate if Ms Sturgeon misled Parliament.

Alex Cole-Hamilton.

Mr Cole-Hamilton has said that if the First Minister is found to have misled parliament, she should resign.

A Scottish Government spokesman said: “We are aware of the letter. The remit of Mr Hamilton’s work is well established, and was set out to the parliament by the deputy first minister.”