Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Fresh row over flyover funding

Post Thumbnail

A row over who is responsible for paying for a flyover at a north-east road junction was re-ignited last night after the Scottish Government said a major development should not go ahead unless one is built.

Roads agency Transport Scotland said the A90 Aberdeen to Dundee trunk road must be upgraded at its junction with the A937 Laurencekirk-Montrose route as a condition of plans to turn Montrose Airfield into a business park being approved.

Officials have told Angus Council that the move would be necessary to ensure the trunk road was not “adversely affected” by proposals to convert the site into offices and facilities to support offshore renewable energy developments.

The application has been submitted by the John Lawrie Group, which is headquartered in Aberdeen, and has yet to be considered by Angus Council’s planning committee.

Transport Minister Keith Brown has previously said developer contribution was a “fundamental principle” to any infrastructure improvements.

But Montrose and District councillor David May insisted that it was up to SNP ministers to pay for a flyover, which could cost between £13million to £29million.

“The government should be funding it because this company cannot possibly afford to pay for a junction,” he added.

“Angus Council has had to consider considerable savings and for us to find millions to pay for a flyover is inconceivable.”

But Montrose campaigner Jill Fotheringham, who has been fighting for a flyover since 2004, claimed the local authority must act because a development of this size would have a “catastrophic effect” on the junction in terms of additional traffic.

“Whilst I know it is situated in Aberdeenshire, any developments in Montrose are having a huge impact on an already saturated junction,” she added.

“Angus Council’s continued blatant disregard for the safety of commuters on this road is nothing short of reckless.”

North-east Conservative MSP Alex Johnstone said the government must step in and resolve what he called a “boundary issue” because although the junction is in Aberdeenshire, improvements would benefit people in Angus.

He added that while he thought the government should be funding the flyover, developers should make an “appropriate contribution” if projects would benefit from the project.

No one at the John Lawrie Group was available for comment.