Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Delay in road safety report sparks anger

Flyover campaigner, Jill Fotheringham
Flyover campaigner, Jill Fotheringham

A campaigner has hit out at a delay in publishing a report on whether calls for a flyover at a notorious north-east road junction are warranted.

Jill Fotheringham said she was dismayed that the Access to Laurencekirk study would now be published in 2015 instead of this year.

The florist has been campaigning for major safety improvements at the A90 Aberdeen to Dundee road at its junction with the A937 Laurencekirk-Montrose road since 2004.

Transport Scotland (TS) provided £100,000 of funding to regional transport partnership Nestrans, which appointed a company called CH2M HILL to consider the road conditions and future traffic growth in the area.

TS official David Anderson told Holyrood’s infrastructure committee, which is examining the case, in March that he hoped the study would be published this summer.

But he has now informed MSPs that the firm needed more time to “gather all the necessary information”.

In a letter to the committee, Mr Anderson said: “The programme of work has been extended and the additional drop in sessions with local residents will now take place early next year.

“In light of these developments we now anticipate the report will be available during the early part of next year.”

Ms Fotheringham said she was not impressed and questioned whether it was a delaying tactic.

“We now face another winter having to cross the junction with no promise that it is going to get better,” she added.

“I am losing hope that the report will bring anything more than reasons why it doesn’t need to be done or it does but our government won’t fund it.

“The junction doesn’t need any more endless reports and studies done on it to know how to fix it.

“It is on a trunk road and it is Transport Scotland’s responsibility, not developers or local councils.”

Transport Minister Keith Brown said he had asked his officials to examine whether the publication date could be brought forward.

Speaking at Holyrood yesterday, he said: “People want to develop in the Laurencekirk area and we want to have the best possible road safety record.

“Those two things should come together and I intend to ensure that happens.”