Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Committee calls for benefits “fundamental redesign”

Dame Anne Begg.
Dame Anne Begg.

The flaws in a controversial benefit scheme are so bad that appointing a new contractor to carry out assessments will not solve the problems, according to a Commons committee.

In a report published today, the work and pensions committee called for a “fundamental redesign” of the employment and support allowance (ESA).

Past criticism led to French firm Atos, which carried out work capability assessments (WCA) on behalf of the government, to give up its contract six months early.

A new contractor is expected to be appointed in February next year, with contract involving “multiple providers” tendered in 2018.

The committee said the appointment of a new contractor provided the opportunity to fundamentally redesign ESA, but in the meantime it wants to see a number of changes.

Chairwoman Dame Anne Begg, Labour MP for Aberdeen South, said: “Many people going through the ESA claims process are unhappy with the way they are treated and the decisions which are made about their fitness for work.

“The current provider of the WCA, Atos, has become a lightning rod for all the negativity around the ESA process and the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) and Atos have recently agreed to terminate the contract early.

“But it is DWP that makes the decision about a claimant’s eligibility for ESA – the face-to-face assessment is only one part of the process. Just putting a new private provider in place will not address the problems with ESA and the WCA on its own.

“We are therefore calling for a number of changes which can be made to improve ESA in the short-term, while also recommending a longer-term, fundamental redesign of the whole process.”

Minister for Disabled People Mark Harper said a new contractor will deliver “the best possible service” claimants as well as increase the number of assessments and reduce working times.

“Since its introduction in 2008 by the previous government, there have been four independent reviews of the WCA and a fifth is underway. We have accepted most of the recommendations and made numerous improvements,” he said.

“More than 700,000 people who were on incapacity benefit are now looking for, or making steps to return to work after a work capability assessment – it is crucial that we continue this important process to ensure that people are not written off and we get a fair deal for the taxpayer.”