Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Peers warn of English-only votes impact

Post Thumbnail

Labour and Liberal Democrat peers have attacked the Tories’ bid for English-only votes at Westminster as a “knee-jerk” and “separatist” plan.

The criticism was made as the House of Lords considered proposals for further devolution in the wake of last month’s historic independence referendum.

Prime Minister David Cameron came under fire from many for linking the delivery of more powers to Holyrood to finally resolving the West Lothian question.

Baroness Royall, the Labour opposition leader in the Lords, led the attack.

“English votes for English laws (EVEL) is a purely separatist proposal and one that would produce a two-tier system that would enshrine existing inequalities; drive a wedge between the Scottish and English systems of government; and risk the future of the Union, when what is needed is a constitutional reform that strengthens its integrity,” she said.

Former Labour Scottish Secretary Baroness Liddell backed the warnings against English votes for English laws.

“We must not have two levels of members of parliament. We begin to destroy the United Kingdom if we go down that route,” she said.

Lord Prescott, the former deputy prime minister, called for more decentralisation within England.

“This business of English laws, English vote is just a political fix. It is nothing to do with redistributing power in the way that decentralisation and devolution is about,” he said.

Liberal Democrat Lord Tyler echoed the warnings.

“There must be recognition that the most oversimplified, knee-jerk, hasty reaction of calling for English votes for English laws is simply inadequate: EVEL is not enough,” he said.

Baroness Stowell, the Conservative leader of the House of Lords, said demands for English-only votes at Westminster could not be ignored, however.

“The government respect and support the calls for greater autonomy and devolution in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland – but we cannot ignore England in this equation.

“England is the most decentralised nation in the United Kingdom,” she said.

“With further devolution to Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, we must ensure that the voice of England is heard as well.

“This means establishing a clear principle.

“When decisions affect only the people of England, they should be made by – or with the consent of – the MPs whom those people have elected to represent them.”

Former Tory Scottish Secretary Lord Lang of Monkton expressed concern about the timetable for further devolution.

“I’m uneasy about the rush to action that we all find ourselves firmly committed to, although we do have to honour the commitments that have been given,” he said.