Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Scots MPs could have “final say” on English-only matters

David Mundell's son, Oliver, who is an MSP, is backing a Leave vote
David Mundell's son, Oliver, who is an MSP, is backing a Leave vote

UK ministers have confirmed Scottish MPs could have “the final say” over laws only affecting England – under the very proposal aimed at creating a fairer system.

English Votes for English Laws (Evel) is intended to address the so-called West Lothian Question.

This describes the anomaly in the current process which allows Scottish, Welsh and Northern Irish MPs to vote on devolved matters when the Westminster Parliament is legislating solely for England.

In contrast, English MPs have no say on those same matters when they are being considered by the devolved administrations.

Concerns have been raised that Evel would give English MPs a veto over proposals which only affect their constituents.

But in a briefing before today’s final vote on the proposal, Scottish Secretary David Mundell said English MPs would only have a “greater” say as a result – not the “final” say.

And Leader of the House Chris Grayling pointed to an “acceptance” among English MPs of the need to be “big” in their approach to the Union.

Under the plan, an English-only committee would replace the usual committee stage in respect of bills, or parts of bills, certified as English-only by the Commons speaker.

Then, at the end of the penultimate legislative stage, the relevant minister would have to move a consent motion to determine the support or opposition of English MPs.

If rejected, the legislation would be halted, but if passed the bill would proceed to its final reading at which point all MPs would have a vote.

This means Scottish MPs could block legislation at the final hurdle on decisions where enough Tory backbenchers rebel and the government’s slim majority does not hold up.

So if the Heathrow expansion vote was deemed English-only and English MPs were in favour but the SNP was not, their will could be overturned

Mr Grayling, who is overseeing the proposal, said it was aimed at enabling English MPs to prevent the UK Parliament legislating for England against their wishes.

But he insisted it was not meant to be a way for English MPs – who form a minority in the UK Parliament – to legislate for themselves.

He added: “It gives the English the power to say no, it doesn’t give them the power to say we will do and override the UK Parliament.”

Mr Mundell said: “It’s reaching a balance to give English MPs a greater say, a greater fairness. It’s a greater say, but not the final say.”