Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner.

Stonehaven rail crash: Minister forms group to oversee safety improvements

Brett McCullough, Christopher Stuchbury and Donald Dinnie
Brett McCullough, Christopher Stuchbury and Donald Dinnie

A group will be formed to ensure safety features on older trains are changed after the Stonehaven rail crash, a top politician has announced.

Scotland’s Minister for Transport Jenny Gilruth made the pledge to the Scottish Parliament this afternoon on the day investigators published their final report into the fatal crash.

The Rail Accident Investigation Branch’s 298-page analysis concludes there were multiple failures that contributed to the crash.

Investigators have published 20 recommendations for seven organisations to implement.

Stonehaven rail crash recommendations
Stonehaven rail crash accident site at Carmont.

Seven relate to reducing derailment risk and ensuring trains built prior to 1994 – as the one in the crash was – have modern crashworthiness features.

‘We must learn lessons’

They could include fitting seatbelts and airbags in the driver’s cab and making batteries less like to start fires.

Some changes have already been made to older trains running in Scotland, but Ms Gilruth wants to ensure more change is overseen.

In a speech at Holyrood this afternoon she said: “While rail remains the safest form of transport, we must seek to learn the lessons from this incident, to improve further the safety of all who work and travel on the railways of Scotland.

Minister for Transport Jenny Gilruth made the announcement today

And to ensure that we do take appropriate steps, and quickly, I am announcing today that Transport Scotland will convene a steering group to take forward implementation of the recommendations about safety performance in accidents of older rolling stock, including high-speed train rolling stock, on ScotRail.”

‘Outcome would have been better’

RAIB’s report said the train’s coaches “generally performed well in the accident.”

Ms Gilruth said in her speech: “However, RAIB ‘considers it more likely than not that the outcome would have been better if the train had been compliant with modern crashworthiness standards’.”

She added that RAIB acknowledged the speed at the time of the crash was significantly beyond speeds even modern trains are designed to provide protection for.

During her speech, Ms Gilruth also reflected on other parts of the RAIB report, which questioned why a drain at the site was constructed to the wrong design.

Had it been built in the right way, it would have functioned better and possibly not washed debris onto the track.

Urgent meeting

The report also questioned why route control officers allowed the train to drive without a speed limit despite knowing of four obstacles on the line within 11 miles of the crash scene.

Grant Shapps, secretary of state for Transport at the scene of the accident. Picture by Kim Cessford

Ms Gilruth said she this morning wrote to her UK Government counterpart, Grant Shapps “seeking an urgent meeting to discuss the report’s findings in full detail – and what that means for both Governments.”

Mr Shapps, who visited the crash scene the day after the tragedy, is to write to the families of those who lost loved ones in the crash to discuss any concerns following the findings of the report.

A Network Rail spokesman said: “The report is not about apportioning blame, but about understanding what happened on August 12 and we will now carefully review the final report and the recommendations that RAIB makes.

“The report makes clear there are fundamental lessons to be learnt by Network Rail and the wider rail industry.”

A ScotRail spokesman said: ““The majority of the RAIB recommendations relate to other parties but ScotRail will play its part fully in ensuring that safety lessons are learned.

“We are working closely with Network Rail and the wider industry to do everything possible to reduce the risk of something like this ever happening again.”


Already a subscriber? Sign in