Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Erica Munro: Politicians need to stop acting like children and remember how they were raised

Health Secretary Matt Hancock is often accused of avoiding the question in TV interviews
Health Secretary Matt Hancock is often accused of avoiding the question in TV interviews

Like most people, I feel enormous frustration when listening to interviews with politicians, amazed by the frequency and scale of the yawning chasm between question and response.

How has it come to this? Let’s go back to childhood to try and work it out.

Erica Munro

Parenting is a job. And, like all jobs, it comes with a series of measurable outcomes through which we can evaluate our effectiveness.

We start out terrified, knowing nothing apart from our duty to see the role through to its end goal, which is to turn out young adults who can survive on their own in the wild.

The hours are horrendous. Our basic tasks involve delivering love, food and shelter and we are expected to add value by ensuring they leave our care with sound toothbrushing habits, a minimally traumatic education and some swimming badges.

It all comes down to empathy

There’s more to it than that, obviously, so I messaged my three 20-something children.

“Tell me one thing you think is an absolute basic that a parent should teach their child,” I typed, adding a needy smiley face emoji and some kisses.

The responses began well. How to tie shoes came first – tick. Basic housework know-how – tick. Please and thank you.

But then the floodgates opened. The “one thing” rule flew out the window and the replies tumbled in. Confidence. Independence. Honesty. Manners. Respect. How to behave in public. The value of hard work. Consent. Kindness. Safe sex. The realities of life and death. An understanding that parental love and support is unconditional.

By this point, of course, I’m growing a little shifty but they’re on a roll.

Much of good parenting boils down to teaching empathy

Treating everyone the same, from prince to pauper. An understanding that everyone has control over their own rights and their own space. Gratitude for what you have and a realisation that what you have doesn’t make you better than anyone else. Not to be beaten and never to give up.

“So… how did we do?” I eventually type back, tensely.

“C minus” comes the – surely – light-hearted response, although with a job description like the one above, a C minus seems like a pretty strong outcome. I should be happy with that.

After all, academic excellence, the acquisition of money and the right to do anything we please didn’t get a mention and that warms my heart.

If we were to collate the responses into some kind of appraisal spreadsheet, a dominant pattern would emerge. Most of them involve understanding how to relate to others and where to place ourselves valuably in a world formed of human interaction. It’s empathy, isn’t it?

Politicians bring out the frustrated parent in me

So, back to politicians and interviews. Whenever a politician on the radio or TV dodges, hurls blame and obfuscates their response to a direct question, I feel a surge of parental exasperation. I wonder when and why that empathy got lost along the way.

This person is in a position of power, representing me and my family, and they are making fools of us and wasting our time. But we put up with it because we expect it now, even though we wouldn’t tolerate it at home. At what point did that person turn their back on everything they ought to have learned as a child? And how dare they ignore a direct question and “bridge” to the message they planned to deliver all along?

It’s what they’ve been trained to do but that’s no excuse. Who trains them – foxes?

I’ve never once heard a politician listen to a question and reply: “I’m afraid I don’t know but I’ll do my best to find out”, thereby respecting the interviewer and valuing the intelligence of the listener. Wouldn’t it be lovely?

Time for a spell in the naughty corner?

I suppose, like children, they do it because they can get away with it. Interviewers have a tough job but their interview protocols need to change. When you think how swiftly media outlets try to adapt to keep up with the times (Twitter feeds, podcasts, digital content) and hold themselves to account (diversity and inclusion strategies, equal pay) it’s tough that they continue giving airtime and status to the bluffers, the windbags, the blamers-of-others, the evaders of answers and the strangers to truth. I’m so hacked off with it.

Perhaps journalists could tell politicians firmly: “This interview is over. You had the nice thing and you didn’t look after it, so you can’t have the nice thing any more.”

Then get someone else. Someone with empathy, who remembers what they were taught as a child.


Erica Munro is a novelist, playwright, screenwriter and freelance editor

Read more by Erica Munro: