Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Dave Boyle: Government intervention is needed to level the football playing field

German clubs like FC Bayern Munich must be owned by fans (Photo: Sven Beyrich/SPP/Shutterstock)
German clubs like FC Bayern Munich must be owned by fans (Photo: Sven Beyrich/SPP/Shutterstock)

There’s a long-standing tradition that football was largely treated as falling outside government policy.

Unless fans required policing or grounds needed to be made more safe, football was left to get on with things. So it’s a curious development to see the UK Government demanding bids for Chelsea FC, which is caught in its net of sanctions targeting Vladimir Putin’s and his coterie.

Lenin once said that “there are decades where nothing happens; and there are weeks where decades happen” and, as Roman Abramovich found out to his detriment, wars are one of those circumstances during which governments can suddenly change the habits of a lifetime.

It’s to be hoped that this newfound appetite for intervention continues, as without it, very little will change. But change it must, if football is to escape the depressing cycle of financial frailty and scandals when inconvenient truths about too many of its owners can no longer be ignored.

More money means better teams

The underlying structural problem is the arms race of spending on players. Football might be a game of opinions, as Bill Shankly said, but one undisputed truth is that clubs with more money get better players, and better players make for better teams, which make for champions.

Many clubs often find themselves little more than three or four weeks away from a catastrophic cash flow crisis, teetering on the brink of collapse.

A recent survey by Fair Game, a group of clubs lobbying for change, found that more than 50% of the English game’s 92 outfits were technically bankrupt. That’s shocking and, yet, not at all a surprise. For most teams, large and small, it was ever thus.

A ‘Roman empire’ banner hung at Stamford Bridge recently for a Chelsea versus Newcastle game (Photo: Dave Shopland/Shutterstock)

The deal with owners was simple: money in, reputation out. You elevated yourself from mere businessman to civic benefactor and local hero. And back to zero if the club then folds when the tap is turned off, like Gretna did.

That’s still the case, only instead of local scrap metal dealers making good, it is now sportswashing for unsavoury regimes and reputation enhancement for sketchy oligarchs.

Questions about the ethics of how you ended up fabulously wealthy go away much more easily when you own a football club and make good use of the directors’ box. If you can get your fans to become your social media army, defending you at every turn, you’re onto a winner.

Can we learn from Germany?

North and south of the border there is meant to be a “fit and proper person” test, but it has always been hopelessly weak and inadequate. Famously, it was passed by the supposed owner of Portsmouth FC in 2009, even though no one is sure to this day that they ever existed.

There is no magic wand that can be waved where richer owners come in to supercharge the playing budget in Germany

At times like this, you often hear pleas for football on this island to be more like the German system, where clubs have to be owned by their fans, ticket prices are low, stadiums modern and atmospheric. There, clubs are properly engaged in giving back to their communities in ways that go beyond corporate social responsibility.

Fan-ownership could completely change the landscape of British football (Photo: Darrell Benns/DCT Media)

It’s a compelling vision, and one we at Supporters Direct helped popularise and advocate for. But the German system works because everyone is in the same boat.

Roman Abramovich couldn’t have bought Bayern Munich, because it’s not for sale. There is no magic wand that can be waved where richer owners come in to supercharge the playing budget in Germany. And, so, because clubs have to earn and trade their way to success, they’re run professionally and, in many cases, a good deal more imaginatively than those in Britain.

But, despite governments constantly fretting about these problems, nothing has happened.

Football needs government action

If you wanted to save on your heating bill, you could burn a pile of reports into the parlous state of football finances, football’s governance, and footballers’ ethics. All of them fail to make a difference because the game calculates that, in a couple of weeks, everyone will have moved on.

There might be a few enlightened clubs where the owners have grasped the problem, but building a coalition for change is hard, taking time and effort for people up to their eyeballs in keeping their team in the black.

The 2015 Community Empowerment Act contains a section that gives Scottish supporters the right to buy their football clubs

This is why, if change is to come, it must be through government action, because the game has shown it can’t and never will do it alone.

A report by former English sports minister Tracey Crouch recommended sweeping changes – independent regulation, licensing, cost controls and the like – and the UK Government are seriously considering giving legislative time to turn this into law.

If this happens, it will surely be harder to buy into a club, but it will also reduce the need for a team’s success to come down to whether an incredibly wealthy individual turns up and offers to help, so long as not no many questions are asked about where the cash came from.

Fan activists are hopeful, but that’s tempered by bitter experience of seeing the government floating similar ideas in 1969, in 1997 and again in 2010 without effect.

Scotland is already one step ahead, however. The 2015 Community Empowerment Act contains a section that gives Scottish supporters the right to buy their football clubs, so every team could become fan-owned, like Hearts, without needing an Ann Budge to help them get there.

However, the law held off giving fans these powers until such time as government ministers actually got around to bringing forward regulations to define how they were to be used. They haven’t done so. Yet.


Dave Boyle is a former chief executive of Supporters Direct, the UK body that supported sports fans to become involved in the ownership and governance of their clubs