Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Martin Gilbert: I’m welcoming new gender pay gap regulations despite the uncomfortable reading

Chief Executive of Aberdeen Asset Management, Martin Gilbert
Chief Executive of Aberdeen Asset Management, Martin Gilbert

Possibly the most significant management issue in the UK at the moment is gender pay gap reporting.

The regulations came into force on April 5 last year, requiring UK companies with more than 250 employees to report on their gender pay gap, with this month the deadline for firms’ compliance.

This is not about equal pay but the difference between the average amount that women and men are paid across an entire workforce.

The data the new regulations provide is perhaps the clearest picture yet about the disparity between men and women’s pay in the UK.

For many companies, it has bolstered arguments about fairness that have been playing out for a number of years.

But the sheer volume of data and the starkness of some of the disparities will have implications for years to come.

I welcome the regulation, even if it makes for uncomfortable reading for those like me with the responsibility to run businesses.

It creates a level of transparency that was hitherto unheard of and will force change.

A big part of the problem for our business is that there are too few women in senior positions.

Like many financial services companies, recruitment across genders is healthy, but not enough women employees progress to senior positions.

Since more senior people are generally paid more, the lack of women in senior positions has helped fuel a gap in the average pay of males and females that is not acceptable.

A similar picture is painted in the numbers of many of our financial services peers and companies in other sectors.

Like other companies, we have been aware of the issue for some time and been making steps to close the gap.

We signed up to the Treasury’s Women in Finance Charter, the 30% Club and other initiatives aimed at improving diversity across the industry.

We took stock last year of our progress on diversity and created an action plan to make change happen.

This included looking again at how we recruit, retain and develop people. We reassessed the support we offer working families and our approach to flexible working.

But, like many companies, we need to do much more. One of the most pernicious aspects of the challenge around diversity is that so much of the bias that is exhibited towards men over women is unconscious.

This happens across society and there is a wealth of research about it.

One study looked at a group of students who took an online course. They were asked to judge the quality of the teaching at the end, having never met the tutor.

Half were told the course was led by a man and the other that it was a woman.

The students who thought they were judging the woman did so more harshly and conversely for the man, even though both groups were taught by the same person.

There are also more obvious biases we need to tackle.

Flexible working, for instance, has long had a reputation for simply not working as hard as if you were in the office.

This attitude is outdated and simply wrong. The reality is that workplaces need to be flexible if they are to get the best from their workers and retain the best people. Attitudes are certainly changing but the pace needs to quicken.

Like so much in the diversity debate, it is a matter of common-business-sense.

If companies are to flourish, they need to make the best of the talent available to them.

Quite apart from being unfair, discouraging – consciously or unconsciously – or discriminating against any one group, whether that is in terms of gender, ethnicity, social background or any other factor, is not in any business’s interests.

You are, by definition, cutting off a source of talent and expertise that could give you a vital edge over your competition.

It is 10 years since the 2008 credit crunch, a period when women fund managers outperformed men, being more focused on downside protection and standing by their investment decisions amid market turbulence.

Globally, research has shown gender-diverse boards performing better than their competitors, recording higher returns of 42% in sales, 53% on equity and 66% on invested capital. Diversity is good business.

If progress is going to be made, then it needs to be led from the top. Everyone, at all levels of a workforce, should feel welcome, respected and valued.