Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

The Flying Pigs: Did the mannie from McKay’s of Queen Street have a wormhole to the 1970s in his stock room?

A black hole in the universe.
A black hole in the universe.

Ron Cluny, Official Council Spokesman

 

I see that Markies have reported a drop in profits. Rather surprisingly they haven’t blamed online competition, discount supermarkets, Brexit or the wrong type of snow – instead, they have come clean, and said it is because they have been left with huge numbers of skinny fit garments left on their shelves.

They described their attempts to renew their customer profile as only a partial success – by which, as an expert in media speak, I can tell they mean it was a total disaster.

Clearly they managed to get rid of their existing client base, but failed to attract the new, trendier sorts who – amazingly enough – turn out not to be especially excited by a Blue Harbour sweatshirt.

They are going to adjust their policies in time for summer, re-introducing more relaxed fits for the larger gentleman. Well, as a larger gentleman myself, I say, hooray for that.

Because neither I, nor the world at large, needs to see me in an unnecessarily snug pair of dookers.

What surprises me is that they seemed to need to carry out a full and detailed inventory check to work out where they had gone wrong.

Which begs the question – did nobody notice the steady stream of fat angry mannies storming down the escalator empty handed, chuntering into their phones about how they were going to be late home because there was nothing for it but to go in past Slaters?

I know, for I was that soldier.

After a hard day’s spin-doctoring and refining the pronouncements of Barney Crockett, I decided to treat myself with a new suit for the office party.

Imagine my horror, as a traditional middle-aged Aberdeen mannikie whose profile becomes more Hitchcockian by the week, when I saw that my choices were: tailored fit, slim fit, skinny fit, and nothing above a 28-inch waist.

It crossed my mind to buy two pairs and stitch them together, but in the end, I just went to the cafe and consoled myself with a fine piece.

So at least the side of the business that provides succour to the comfort eater seems to have a secure future.

Prof Hector Schlenk, Senior Research Fellow of the Boston Institute for Public Engagement with Science

As a scientist, I am often called upon to comment on the great mysteries of the day, such as – how was life on earth created? What goes on inside a black hole? And did the mannie from McKay’s of Queen Street have a wormhole to the 1970s in his stock room?

All unknowable at present, even though we are now in the very sci-fi sounding year of 2020. It is now one year beyond the setting of Ridley Scott’s ‘Blade Runner,’ but we still don’t have flying cars.

However, alongside environmental collapse and rubbish weather, we do now have replicants. This week I was agog at the news that scientists have used stem cells from frog embyros to create the first ‘living robots’.

These tiny ‘biological machines’ or ‘xenobots’ are neither a traditional automaton nor a known species of animal but a living programable organism, designed by a supercomputer and then built by biologists who clearly haven’t seen Jurassic Park.

But what, you may ask, is the purpose in scientists sticking organic material together to create a lifeform never seen before in nature?

Well, the miniature organisms can be programmed to do work, such as transport medicine around the body or clean up pollution from the ocean, though in the latter case presumably that would take a while.

So far, in fact, the xenobots have shown they can push pellets around and organise themselves collectively.

Think of them as a microscopic version of an Amazon warehouse worker, or, if you like, a very tiny football team.

Of course, this does mean there are ethical issues to consider. If they are an entirely new lifeform, and are sufficiently advanced to perform basic tasks and organise themselves collectively, then should they not have rights?

The right to life, liberty, happiness? Or at least to form trade unions, or to take paid holidays and fag breaks?

No doubt the finest minds of our generation will already be applying themselves to the question of whether a new species such as this can be sold a gym membership.

Meanwhile, scientists admit that if the xenobots become sufficiently complex, it might be impossible to predict how they will start to behave. A common problem, as anyone who has small children will attest.

My infant granddaughter recently poured ketchup into my television, meaning it is impossible to watch anything except STV+1.

I’ve now seen four full episodes of Midsommer Murders, and dealing with even the most chaotically malfunctioning xenobot would be sweet relief by comparison.

Granted, these organisms are self-repairing and basically indestructible, and yes, they were designed by a mysterious supercomputer, but don’t be alarmed.

It’s highly unlikely that they are the precursors to an army of humanoid xenobots created to replace us and take over the world; requiring us to send someone back from the future to stop them using an elaborate time machine. I mean, the very idea is fanciful.

Obviously, we’d just use the wormhole in the stockroom of McKay’s of Queen Street.