Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Alex Bell: The latest Tory sleaze row is a pantomime not a scandal

Owen Paterson and Boris Johnson in November 2010 (Photo: Alan Davidson/Shutterstock)

There is something telling in the failing efforts to get “Tory sleaze” to become a scandal.

To recap, a pompous posh man decided he was honourable, and thus at liberty to do what he wanted.

Owen Paterson earned large sums of money for effectively lobbying on behalf of private interests. He won a client a government PPE contract, for example.

Like a lot of MPs, he thought this sideline was compatible with representing his constituency. The ombudsman took a different view and threatened to expel him from the Commons for a few weeks for conducting commercial affairs within parliament.

Boris Johnson found this all a bit too, you know, square and had the Commons vote to change the rules and save Paterson’s honour.

The opposition and media thought this alarmingly authoritarian, and by the next morning Boris couldn’t be bothered with the bad press.

With the government no longer rigging things in his favour, Paterson resigned.

Tory sleaze season isn’t what it used to be

Labour’s Keir Starmer, along with many others, thought the whole affair stank and a “Tory sleaze” season, of unknown length, was unofficially declared. This made lots of people happy because they had a muscle memory of Tory sleaze and remembered it as a fun thing which led to people resigning.

Conveniently, the Daily Mail had another story. This one on the former attorney general Geoffrey Cox.

He earned £1 million pounds from a sideline that seems to have occupied more than 35 hours a week, which rather suggests representing the people of Torridge and West Devon requires no time at all. More outrageous is that he is also known to have voted on parliamentary matters while staying in the Caribbean, which is neither in Torridge, West Devon nor Westminster.

The Liberal Democrats remembered Tory sleaze as being a good thing for winning seats off Conservatives in England. Their North East Fife MP, Wendy Chamberlain, called for the Commons to sit through one of its myriad holidays in order to address the “crisis”.

Wendy Chamberlain called this week’s debate on standards as the Tory sleaze row deepens.

By this time, John Major had publicly despaired of Johnson – again, while Keir Starmer had a shot at outrage, which failed to convince.

Is it Tory sleaze when it’s not breaking the rules?

The problem is that, while common sense suggests these people have behaved like greedy creeps abusing public office, very little of what’s happened is unusual or against the rules.

Paterson erred foolishly and, if he’d kept quiet and gone off to detention, then this would have passed without notice. Cox does seem to have taken the system for a ride, but it’s one the system tolerates.

The fact is, the Commons operates as a bazaar, where public service and commercial opportunity are traded. It always has done. Much as the Lords has always offered seats to the highest party bidder.

That is the British system. It has created the Britain of today.

We have a representative system which gives MPs more than 110 days of recess, allows second jobs and permits outside earnings. Being an MP is, by most definitions, a part-time gig.

Geoffrey Cox knew that when, after a long time in the law, he stood for election 20 years ago, much as Keir Starmer, after a long time in the law, did when he was elected in 2015.

The British parliament operates on the unsaid principle that the kind of personality that makes for a good MP is going to be involved in more things than politics. Those who want power won’t be satisfied with the Commons alone.

Boris Johnson doesn’t care

Opponents are trying to highlight Johnson’s casual attitude to rules, the law, parliament and, while we are at it, the Conservative Party. They want to portray him as a maverick.

The trouble is, the rest of us see him as typical of the system.

This is, after all, the man who tried to prorogue parliament to stop it debating Brexit, only to be chastised by the Supreme Court. Boris doesn’t much care about anyone.

But, then, the same paper now chasing Cox responded to the Supreme Court ruling by calling the judges “enemies of the people”.

The British people might get sentimental about Magna Carta and the mother of parliaments, but they are not stupid. We know government is a squalid pact between public and private in a dirty game for power.

We would like clean politicians who abide by all the rules and dedicate themselves to their constituency. In fairness, we get a lot of them. But, we are under no illusions that power attracts rogues.

Given the election of Johnson, first as mayor of London, then as Tory leader, and finally as Prime Minister; despite twice being sacked from the cabinet (once for lying), fathering children out of wedlock and publicly being denounced as a charlatan, it seems we quite like a certain amount of moral dishevelment.

Which is why this sleaze season will be short-lived, and will probably result in no more resignations. And that may be OK, as we do not have the appetite for a big philosophical debate on the purpose of politicians in mature, stable democracies.

What’s more, we love a bit of pantomime.

And what’s not to like about Carry On Cox?