Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Alex Bell: As two sides engage in the constitutional tango, the question is, which one is blind?

Post Thumbnail

Al Pacino has been nominated for an Oscar for his turn as Jimmy Hoffa in the film The Irishman.

The last time he picked up a statuette was in 1992 for Scent of a Woman, a film so awful anyone under 40 may not have seen it or know of its existence. It features a blind army colonel enjoying a last hurrah. Pacino punctuates the film with bursts of “hoo haa” in a performance so scenery-chewing it’s a marvel there’s any background to shoot.

In one scene Pacino’s character performs the tango with a beautiful woman, to the sentimental amazement of his young sidekick, and by extension, the audience. Schmaltz doesn’t cover it.

Alex Bell.

The idea of an elaborate dance with a blind participant seems fitting for 2020, the year of the constitutional tango. The first twirl occurred this week, when to no one’s surprise Boris Johnson said no to Nicola Sturgeon’s request for indyref2.

The tango is a strict dance that requires lots of practice. Performed by old pros it’s a beautiful thing. Bojo and the FM did it well.

Sturgeon got to show that she’s dancing for Scotland and that Boris is a cruel man, Johnson that he’s shuffling for Britain. The audience were neither aroused nor surprised – it’s same old, same old.

The question is – which one of them is blind?

Sturgeon has promised indyref2 in 2020. In public she means it. But then, she meant it when speaking publicly of another vote in 2018. Remember that? It didn’t happen.

SNP senior figures talk openly of there being no referendum until after a victory at the 2021 Holyrood election.

Kenny MacAskill, now MP for East Lothian, was slapped down by the party for saying the chance of indyref2 happening in 2020 was nil, but he only said what everyone knows.

No doubt Nicola will keep the pretence up and carry on dancing, but from one perspective she looks like the blind one. Going through the old routine, buying time, still not sure how she makes a breakthrough. Trouble is, she’s high in the polls, but low on reputation.

In a recent blog, the head of the Fraser of Allander Institute said the SNP had to end the magical thinking over the £9 billion gap between spending and revenue that exists in the nation’s accounts. When all the hoo haa is dismissed, this is the matter at the heart of the indy debate.

It is also a matter which increasingly bothers Nats. They can’t understand why the SNP rubbishes the idea of the £9 billion deficit, but annually produces figures as the Scottish Government which confirm the gap.

To this end Finance Minister Derek Mackay now promises to publish an alternative set of accounts, from the government, which gives the real SNP view of Scotland’s tax and spend. Alongside the party’s Growth Commission, it could prove fascinating, and maybe magical.

The indy movement should note that the PM’s letter rejecting Sturgeon’s request focused not on the £9 billion question, the usual line of attack by Unionists on indy, but on the Scottish Government’s record.

He said another vote would continue “the political stagnation that Scotland has seen for the last decade, with Scottish schools, hospitals and jobs again left behind”.

This is becoming a real problem for the first minister. Public trust in the NHS and education is falling. The silence over new ideas is eerie, the reliance on blaming London tiresome. When Boris suggests she’s only dancing to distract from domestic problems, he makes a resonant point.

Nicola neither has a strategy to break the legal impasse over referendum powers nor a plan to improve Scottish services. She’s just hoping that a big win in 2021 will somehow change things. Another year of this and Scots might become disillusioned with both Westminster and Holyrood.

The flip side of this is sheer numbers. Tens of thousands took to the streets of Glasgow in what is becoming a regular feature of Scottish life – the pro-indy march. In an age of supposed apathy and distrust of politics, this is an astonishing phenomenon.

So too the 45% support for the SNP at the ballot box, given the weakness in their core argument and poor performance. This is democracy at its simplest. Close to half the nation supports an independence party, and who knows how many more might say Yes when forced to choose.

Against that, to say No appears to be blind to reality. Boris can’t claim he is a champion of the ignored (in the north of England) while ignoring the voters of Scotland. The Institute for Government along with various southern MPs have spoken of another referendum as irresistible, given the democratic arithmetic.

Johnson dances, as he has throughout his career, often seeming to not know the steps or where’s he going. He’s not a strategist, but a tactician with lucky bones. But there’s only so long he can stand on Scottish toes before the music changes.

As for us, the audience, we are in for a dull year of predictable moves. Roll on 2021.