Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Catherine Deveney: Have no doubt that a woman’s place is in the kitchen – the professional one

Chef Angela Hartnett
Chef Angela Hartnett

Oh, you’ve got to laugh. Celebrity chef Heston Blumenthal is causing a stir – see what I did there? – with his wacky views about why women aren’t making it as chefs.

Naively, I thought it was because of the excessively macho culture in professional kitchens that sees, I was once told by a food critic, chefs punish their underlings by sticking their hands in hot oil. (Assault to the rest of us but discipline in a pro kitchen.)

Catherine Deveney.

Plus, the male-dominated business networks and the male bankers’ preference for investing in other men. Apparently not. Heston says it’s because once they become mothers, women find it difficult to lift heavy pots and pans.  Who knew?

Certainly not the army of women who drain spaghetti with one child hanging off their back and another swinging from their waist band. As the gender doing most of the domestic cooking, you might expect women to excel in the culinary world but female chefs like Clare Smyth and Angela Hartnett are the minority. In fact, according to the Office of National Statistics, less than 20% of chefs are women.

Even in the business world, women account for 24% of company CEOs which means they are actually doing better in the boardroom than the industrial kitchen. Of the 621 recipients of Michelin stars in the 2018 guide, only two were women. And both of them were working with male partners.

They may be trusted with the daily grind of family fare but women apparently don’t cut it when it comes to the haute cuisine favoured by Blumenthal who counts amongst his dishes konbu cured halibut, or sea jelly beans and monks beard (what even IS that?) served on “sand” made from tapioca starch, toasted Japanese breadcrumbs, miso paste and dried seaweed. Important food, in other words, is created by men. Women are cooks; men are chefs. Women are caterers; men are artistes.

Interestingly, Blumenthal is recognised for his “scientific” approach (just not when it comes to gender issues) and is the nutty professor of celebrity kitchen innovation. Stick a white coat on a woman who, like Blumenthal, failed his science O level and she’ll get entered for a naughty doctors and nurses competition. Put one on Blumenthal and he gets three honorary university degrees and a Fellowship from the Royal Society of Chemistry.

Not bad just because you know how to use a blow torch and make scented dry ice, and how to serve your bacon ice cream accompanied by the sound of sizzling bacon because appealing to more than one sense apparently makes the flavour more intense. Savoury ice cream is Blumenthal’s speciality: crab ice cream, smoked salmon ice-cream, bacon and egg ice cream…. Aye, very good Heston. Any vanilla?

And the serious point behind all this? That the same task, conducted by two different genders, is viewed completely differently. Who sees the nation’s domestic chefs as innovators and creators? Women have always been involved with food and on the whole, they have traditionally used it to nurture, a way of socialising and “looking after” those they care about. It’s ironic that the kitchen became a symbol of women’s domestic imprisonment, but restaurant kitchens, where there is prestige and money, are male dominated.

When a profession is regarded as “feminine”, pay levels drop, so there’s good reason for male chefs to resist the transference of women from the domestic kitchen to the industrial one. One way they do so is promoting the macho atmosphere that makes most women run a mile, and prompts male food writers to suggest women don’t have the “emotional strength” to be chefs. Gordon Ramsay can be funny, charming – and vicious. I once watched in horror as his staff were lined up in front of me and humiliated, personal insults flowing. The culinary approach to staff development.

And the other serious point? We simply do not question enough the way the world is, accepting that it is “just the way things are” rather than recognising the social manipulation that goes on to make them that way and more importantly, keep them that way. So, Chef Blumenthal spouts pseudo-science about “body clocks” and “evolution” because he’s drunk it in from somewhere (though evidently not his ‘O’ level science class) and a giant dung- heap of societal stereotyping develops.

This evening, I’ll do the catering (again) and being a boring woman, I need to up my game and create something exotic. It had better not involve big pans in case I drop them. Small will do. Just big enough to concoct a little portion of what those famously discerning gourmands, the French – or indeed contestants in the celebrity jungle – would call râgout de testicules. Testicle stew to you and me.


Catherine Deveney is an award-winning investigative journalist, novelist and television presenter