Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Treasury challenges SNP on oil and immigration

Post Thumbnail

The Treasury has claimed that Scotland is already spending its entire share of North Sea oil revenues – and would need enough immigrants to fill Edinburgh to plug a workforce gap after independence.

Senior sources at Westminster yesterday revealed some of the key arguments they will make in the coalition’s “most comprehensive” analysis yet on Scottish independence, due for publication next week.

It is claimed that Scotland would need to triple its immigration rates – attracting the equivalent of Edinburgh’s population of 500,000 by 2036 – to have the same “dependency ratio” as the UK.

The ratio is the number of pensioners versus the amount of working-age adults paying taxes into the state.

The paper, to be unveiled on Wednesday, will also say that three key SNP pledges – to extend childcare, halve taxes on passenger flights and cut corporation tax – would cost £1.6billion per year.

On North Sea oil and gas, the officials suggested there would be no gain whatsoever for Scotland because the nation’s 90% share of offshore revenues already effectively funds higher spending north of the border.

The Treasury argues that, as North Sea receipts decline after independence, a gap in Scotland’s budget will grow.

“A critical point here is that Scotland is essentially already spending all of the receipts that it would get from the North Sea, even if you assume a geographical share of North Sea oil and gas receipts,” a source said.

“So given that it’s already being spent, if the receipts then decline that clearly creates an increasing hole in the public finances.”

The officials pointed out that the Scottish Government’s “most pessimistic” North Sea forecast for 2016/17, the first year of independence, was £4billion higher than figures produced by the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR).

“As pessimism goes, it’s a pretty optimistic view of pessimism,” one said.

However, when asked if the industry had been consulted – including Oil and Gas UK, which has described the OBR’s projections are “pessimistic” – the Treasury officials suggested there had been no talks.

“We have used the forecasts that the OBR used for the UK. They are the official numbers that are out there,” the source said.

“We are aware that there are higher projections. The UK Government did the Wood Review that talked about a potential upside, and we’ve flagged that potential upside in the document next week.”

The Westminster government says the figures are its “definitive position”, but that it would be happy for independent bodies to assess the report’s calculations.

Last night, a spokesman for Finance Secretary John Swinney said: “Scotland is one of the wealthiest countries in the world, more prosperous per head than the UK, France and Japan – but we need the powers of independence to ensure that wealth properly benefits everyone in our society.

“On immigration, net migration to Scotland is already more than 10,000 a year, and independence will allow us to have a flexible policy to suit our economic needs, unlike UK immigration policy which is harming Scotland and which has just this week been condemned by one of Scotland’s leading university principals as ‘trying its best to destroy a global brand’.

“It is deeply revealing, but not surprising, that the Treasury’s main attack on independence plays the immigration card, as the Westminster establishment panders to a Ukip agenda.”