Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner.

Analysis: SNP front bench departures expose need for a succession plan

First Minister Nicola Sturgeon.
First Minister Nicola Sturgeon.

In any normal government, losing one Cabinet secretary might be regarded as misfortune, but losing four begins to look a bit more like carelessness.

In Scotland, though, barely an eyebrow is raised at the prospect of Nicola Sturgeon being left without a third of her top team following a wave of retirements which have now been announced ahead of the Holyrood election next year.

Even the news on Monday night of the departure of the nation’s under-pressure health secretary, Jeane Freeman, failed to really register on the political Richter scale, despite her role at the heart of Scotland’s response to the worst public health crisis in memory.

The reason, perhaps, is that the SNP leadership and its opponents both know the looming changing of the guard is unlikely to cause any real damage to a party that has already been governing for an unusually long period, with no end imminent.

Cabinet Secretary for Health and Sport Jeane Freeman.

Three of the four Cabinet secretaries who are standing down would have been in their 70s within the lifetime of the next parliament, and all of them would appear to have reached the decision of their own volition, not because of any internal disputes.

Of course, Ms Sturgeon might have preferred to have been able to continue to call on the huge experience of the likes of Constitution Secretary Michael Russell or Environment Secretary Roseanna Cunningham, who are among those poised to leave.

She will no doubt also regret the departure of former ministers Bruce Crawford and Stewart Stevenson, and even the independent-minded and often outspoken Alex Neil.

Constitution Secretary Michael Russell and First Minister Nicola Sturgeon.

But the first minister, who has rarely reshuffled her Cabinet or wielded the axe during her time in the top job, must also be relishing the potential influx of fresh blood into a team that appears to be on course to extend its 13-year tenure in government next year.

Any administration requires refreshing at regular intervals, not least one that is half way through its second decade in power.

Energy and enthusiasm will be required for the battle that seemingly lies ahead with Westminster over a second independence referendum, not to mention the task of winning a decisive victory in such a vote if and when it is to be held.

A new intake of young talent is likely to arrive in Edinburgh next May, while all-female shortlists of candidates to replace retiring male MSPs will help achieve a greater gender balance in the party and parliament.

Ms Sturgeon may also find some familiar faces by her side, such as former SNP deputy leader Angus Robertson, to replace the experience of retiring members.

Former SNP deputy leader Angus Robertson.

But while finding replacements for the outgoing Cabinet secretaries may be achieved with relative ease, this highlights a weakness within the SNP, rather than a strength.

In truth, all 11 members of the Cabinet could retire next year, other than the first minister, and it would not dent the party’s popularity.

Only Ms Sturgeon would seem to be irreplaceable, and that should alarm her supporters, because at some point she will have to be replaced.

The SNP leader only turned 50 this year, which is relatively young in politics, but she has been on the front-line since the 1990s, and the relentlessness of responding to the current coronavirus crisis is bound to take its toll, not to mention the potential fall-out from the Alex Salmond inquiries.

First Minister Nicola Sturgeon during a visit to the NHS Louisa Jordan at the SEC, Glasgow.

Last year, there were rumours that Ms Sturgeon might be preparing for her exit and, while they were dismissed, she cannot go on forever.

If the party is to continue to defy the expectations of what is “normal” for a government, and deliver its ultimate goal of independence, it must hope a successor emerges in the next parliament to fill one of the newly vacant places in the first minister’s top team.

Because losing a leader of her status and popularity, while failing to have a succession plan in place for the future, really would be regarded as carelessness.

Already a subscriber? Sign in

[[title]]

[[text]]