Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Scottish farming leaders urge Lords to protect post-Brexit food standards

NFUS president Andrew McCornick

Scottish farming leaders have urged peers to defend their “red line” on post-Brexit food standards when they reconsider contentious legislation today.

The National Farmers’ Union Scotland (NFUS) want the House of Lords to adopt an amendment to the Agriculture Bill aimed at protecting food standards in trade deals.

Peers previously suggested the amendment in order to block the import of food produced abroad with lower animal welfare standards, amid warnings over chlorinated chicken or hormone-treated beef entering the UK market from the US.

But, writing in this newspaper today, Scotland Office minister David Duguid pointed to “misleading and alarmist reports” on food standards which were “categorically untrue”.

The Banff and Buchan MP added that the Bill was a “vital piece of legislation which will mean Scottish farmers can flourish outside of the EU”.

Last week, the UK Government won a vote in the Commons to reject the House of Lords amendment, which would have required agricultural and food imports to meet domestic standards.

NFU Scotland president Andrew McCornick speaking at the union’s AGM in February 2020.

NFUS president Andrew McCornick said: “NFUS was bitterly disappointed that, despite vast support from consumers, stakeholders, and cross-party MPs, the UK Government chose not to support new clause 16 to the Agriculture Bill which would have upheld, in legislation, the principle that no produce that has been produced to inequivalent standards as what is required of UK producers could be imported into the UK following any future trade negotiations.

“This principle has always been a red-line issue for NFU Scotland, and whilst it was been batted back by a majority in the House of Commons last week, there is still a vital window of opportunity for improvements to be made to the Bill which would strengthen oversight and scrutiny of trade negotiations.

“These improvements would be delivered via the Lord Curry amendment which would strengthen the role of the Trade and Agriculture Commission and allow MPs to have greater oversight of trade negotiations before they are agreed.

“NFU Scotland has worked alongside all UK farming unions to advocate strongly for these measures throughout the passage of the Bill.”

This principle has always been a red-line issue for NFU Scotland, and whilst it was been batted back by a majority in the House of Commons last week, there is still a vital window of opportunity for improvements to be made.”

He added: “We believe this is a sensible, proportionate measure which would ensure that the UK Government can pursue its desired independent trade policy post-Brexit but would also ensure that democratic oversight and expert advice on the implications of trade negotiations for domestic agriculture are formally considered.

“NFU Scotland can see no good reason for this amendment not to be supported.”

Douglas Ross on Question Time

Several Conservative MPs have also outlined their support for the Lords amendment, with the division list showing 14 rebelled in an attempt to retain it – including former environment secretary Theresa Villiers and Scottish Conservative Party leader Douglas Ross, the Moray MP.

But it was stripped from the Bill following the vote on Monday last week.

The Conservative government has argued that existing protections are already in place and they have no intention of watering them down.